public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Alejandro Colomar" <alx@kernel.org>, GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
	glibc <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	"Bastien Roucariès" <rouca@debian.org>,
	"Stefan Puiu" <stefan.puiu@gmail.com>,
	"Igor Sysoev" <igor@sysoev.ru>, "Rich Felker" <dalias@libc.org>,
	"Andrew Clayton" <a.clayton@nginx.com>,
	"Richard Biener" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	"Zack Weinberg" <zack@owlfolio.org>,
	"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	"Joseph Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	"Jakub Jelinek" <jakub@redhat.com>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sockaddr.3type: BUGS: Document that libc should be fixed using a union
Date: Sun,  5 Feb 2023 16:28:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230205152835.17413-1-alx@kernel.org> (raw)

As discussed before, and Bastien and I seem to agree, ideally we should
define the following types:

    struct sockaddr_storage {
        union {
            struct {
                sa_family_t      ss_family;
            };
            struct sockaddr_in   sin;
            struct sockaddr_in6  sin6;
            struct sockaddr_un   sun;
            // ...
        };
    };

    struct [[deprecated]] sockaddr {
        sa_family_t              sa_family;
    };

    union [[gnu::transparent_union]] sockaddr_ptr {
        struct sockaddr_storage  *ss;
        struct sockaddr          *sa;
    };

And then we could define APIs like:

    int bind(int sockfd, const union sockaddr_ptr *addr, socklen_t len);

Link: <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/ab492040-2058-bcbe-c920-a9088a20f071@gmail.com/T/#u>
Link: <https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20230120134043.10247-1-alx@kernel.org/T/#u>
Cc: GCC <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: glibc <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Bastien Roucariès <rouca@debian.org>
Cc: Stefan Puiu <stefan.puiu@gmail.com>
Cc: Igor Sysoev <igor@sysoev.ru>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Andrew Clayton <a.clayton@nginx.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack@owlfolio.org>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
---
 man3type/sockaddr.3type | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/man3type/sockaddr.3type b/man3type/sockaddr.3type
index 319a5e552..239e836fc 100644
--- a/man3type/sockaddr.3type
+++ b/man3type/sockaddr.3type
@@ -120,6 +120,26 @@ .SH NOTES
 .I <netinet/in.h>
 and
 .IR <sys/un.h> .
+.SH BUGS
+.I sockaddr_storage
+was designed back when strict aliasing wasn't a problem.
+Back then,
+one would define a variable of that type,
+and then access it as any of the other
+.IR sockaddr_ *
+types,
+depending on the value of the first member.
+This is Undefined Behavior.
+However, there is no way to use these APIs without invoking Unedfined Behavior,
+either in the user program or in libc,
+so it is still recommended to use this method.
+The only correct way to use different types in an API is through a union.
+However,
+that union must be implemented in the library,
+since the type must be shared between the library and user code,
+so libc should be fixed by implementing
+.I sockaddr_storage
+as a union.
 .SH SEE ALSO
 .BR accept (2),
 .BR bind (2),
-- 
2.39.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-05 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-05 15:28 Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2023-02-05 15:31 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-02-06  6:02   ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-02-06 11:20     ` Rich Felker
2023-02-06 11:55     ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-02-06 13:38       ` Rich Felker
2023-02-06 14:11         ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-02-06 17:21           ` Zack Weinberg
2023-02-06 17:48           ` Rich Felker
2023-02-05 23:43 ` Rich Felker
2023-02-05 23:59   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-02-06  0:15     ` Rich Felker
2023-02-06 18:45 ` Eric Blake
2023-02-07  1:21   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-18  7:54   ` roucaries bastien
2023-03-20 10:49     ` Alejandro Colomar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230205152835.17413-1-alx@kernel.org \
    --to=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.clayton@nginx.com \
    --cc=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=igor@sysoev.ru \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=rouca@debian.org \
    --cc=stefan.puiu@gmail.com \
    --cc=zack@owlfolio.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).