public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>,
	Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86-64: Optimize bzero
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:42:06 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4560acb-8c0d-4062-efc5-39fc87dc2229@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8513ca6-7ed7-281d-9162-a4dd7a63e9f6@gmail.com>



On 10/02/2022 17:27, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
>> We are discussing different subjects here: what I want is to remove the
>> glibc *internal* optimization for bzero, which is essentially an
>> implementation detail.  In a first glance it would change performance,
>> however gcc does a hard job replacing bzero/bcmp/bcopy with their
>> str* counterparts, so it highly unlike that newer binaries will actually
>> call bzero.
> 
> Okay, then yes, go ahead and remove bzero(3) from glibc if GCC will
> continue supporting it.  Just remember that some users keep writing and
> wanting to write bzero(3) instead of memset(3) in their .c files, so
> it's far from being dead in source code.

Again, I am not proposing to *remove* bzero, but rather the internal
optimizations that currently only adds code complexity and maintenance
burden.  My patchset [1] will keep the ABI as-is, the difference is
bcopy and bzero will use the default implementation on all architectures.

[1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=7243

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-10 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 22:43 H.J. Lu
2022-02-08 23:56 ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-09 11:41 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-09 22:14   ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-10 12:35     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-10 13:01       ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-02-10 13:10         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-10 13:16           ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-10 13:17           ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-02-10 13:22             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-10 17:50               ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2022-02-10 19:19                 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-02-10 20:27                   ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2022-02-10 20:42                     ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2022-02-10 21:07                       ` Patrick McGehearty
2022-02-11 13:01                         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-12 23:46                           ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-14 12:07                             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-14 12:41                               ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-14 14:07                                 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-14 15:03                                   ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-04  6:35                                     ` Sunil Pandey
2022-05-04 12:52                                       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-05-04 14:50                                         ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-04 14:54                                           ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-10 22:00                       ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2022-02-10 19:42                 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-10 18:28         ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-10 18:35         ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-15 13:38 Wilco Dijkstra
2022-02-23  8:12 ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-23 12:09   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-02-24 13:16   ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-02-24 15:48     ` H.J. Lu
2022-02-24 22:58     ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-24 23:21       ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-25 17:37         ` Noah Goldstein
2022-02-25 13:51       ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-02-25 17:35         ` Noah Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c4560acb-8c0d-4062-efc5-39fc87dc2229@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
    --cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).