public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>
To: caiyinyu <caiyinyu@loongson.cn>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org,
	 xry111@xry111.site
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Add soft floating-point fe* function implementations.
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:34:48 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb65a988-d564-f783-5eea-3a8fb0d31e58@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240326124623.1245676-1-caiyinyu@loongson.cn>

On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, caiyinyu wrote:

> This patch accomplishes the following:
> 1. Implements soft floating-point functions to enhance compatibility and
>   flexibility in environments without hardware floating-point support.

Does this actually do anything useful for users, i.e. make the software 
floating-point rounding mode and exceptions state affect both user 
arithmetic and functions within libc/libm?  As far as I can see, while 
you're building copies of some software floating-point libgcc functions 
for libc, you're not doing anything to make them use the software 
floating-point environment state, and not exporting them for use by users.

For software floating-point rounding modes and exceptions to be useful to 
users, you need to follow powerpc/nofpu and export the functions from 
libc.  You then need to arrange for libgcc *not* to provide the functions 
when libc does (see how libgcc/configure.ac sets ppc_fp_compat depending 
on glibc version, for example).  And there's also the matter of providing 
libc (as opposed to libm) interfaces for cases where compiler-generated 
code may need to manipulate floating-point environment state without 
calling libm functions (see how powerpc-nofpu provides 
__atomic_feholdexcept __atomic_feclearexcept __atomic_feupdateenv 
__flt_rounds and rs6000_atomic_assign_expand_fenv in the GCC back end can 
generate calls to the first three of those functions - the fourth is 
future-proofing for if GCC gets proper support for making FLT_ROUNDS 
depend on the rounding mode in future).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@redhat.com


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-26 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-26 12:46 caiyinyu
2024-03-26 17:34 ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2024-03-27  8:42   ` caiyinyu
2024-03-27 17:10     ` Joseph Myers
2024-03-31 10:14       ` caiyinyu
2024-04-01 13:19         ` Florian Weimer
2024-04-02  3:40           ` caiyinyu
2024-04-02 10:40             ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-04-02 11:45               ` Florian Weimer
2024-04-02 12:02                 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-04-02 12:34                   ` Florian Weimer
2024-04-02 12:12               ` Andreas Schwab
2024-04-02 21:18             ` Joseph Myers
2024-03-31 10:31       ` caiyinyu
2024-04-02 21:10         ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-02 14:46 caiyinyu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cb65a988-d564-f783-5eea-3a8fb0d31e58@redhat.com \
    --to=josmyers@redhat.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=caiyinyu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).