public inbox for libc-ports@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTED PATCH] add missing const in arm_gnu_pltexit signature
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADZpyiz2EoubHCpHDEeVuNrP0i8H3sXLQ-qFysOW9AXQBWTSMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120808215850.048902C0ED@topped-with-meat.com>

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
> This fixes a 'discarded const' warning compiling dl-runtime.c, because
> the signature of the function pointer lacked the const that other machines
> have.
>
> Committed as obvious.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
>
>
> ports/ChangeLog.arm
>         * sysdeps/arm/ldsodefs.h (ARCH_PLTEXIT_MEMBERS): Use const on
>         `struct La_arm_regs *' parameter.
>
> diff --git a/ports/sysdeps/arm/ldsodefs.h b/ports/sysdeps/arm/ldsodefs.h
> index aa323d3..73375b6 100644
> --- a/ports/sysdeps/arm/ldsodefs.h
> +++ b/ports/sysdeps/arm/ldsodefs.h
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  /* Run-time dynamic linker data structures for loaded ELF shared objects.
> -   Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +   Copyright (C) 2005-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>     This file is part of the GNU C Library.
>
>     The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct La_arm_retval;
>
>  #define ARCH_PLTEXIT_MEMBERS \
>      Elf32_Addr (*arm_gnu_pltexit) (Elf32_Sym *, unsigned int, uintptr_t *,   \
> -                                  uintptr_t *, struct La_arm_regs *,        \
> +                                  uintptr_t *, const struct La_arm_regs *,  \
>                                    struct La_arm_retval *, const char *)
>
>  #include_next <ldsodefs.h>

I did a quick scan of all the other targets and noticed something I
thought was odd...

Why do sh, sparc, mips, m68k, ia64, alpha use `const struct La_sh_regs
*' for ARCH_PLTENTER_MEMBERS?

Shouldn't that set of register be modifiable by the called audit function?

Cheers,
Carlos.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-09 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-08 21:59 Roland McGrath
2012-08-09 22:56 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2012-08-09 23:00   ` Roland McGrath
2012-08-09 23:30     ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-08-09 23:39       ` Roland McGrath
2012-08-10  9:02   ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CADZpyiz2EoubHCpHDEeVuNrP0i8H3sXLQ-qFysOW9AXQBWTSMQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=carlos@systemhalted.org \
    --cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
    --cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).