* Re: Unreviewed libffi patch [not found] <yddk3mrtk3k.fsf@lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> @ 2013-05-22 9:58 ` Andrew Haley [not found] ` <CACxje59X_rLcSd7NO1yUNQEjRjeN9hoNkv+FSbA4MNiKxa9FpQ@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Andrew Haley @ 2013-05-22 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: libffi-discuss; +Cc: Rainer Orth On 05/22/2013 10:55 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > The following libffi patch > > [libffi] Fix several libffi testsuite failures on 64-bit SPARC and PowerPC (PR libffi/56033) > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg00840.html > > has remained unreviewed for a week. It needs a libffi maintainer, which > I suppose Anthony still is, despite not being listed in MAINTAINERS. Forwarding to libffi. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CACxje59X_rLcSd7NO1yUNQEjRjeN9hoNkv+FSbA4MNiKxa9FpQ@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: Unreviewed libffi patch [not found] ` <CACxje59X_rLcSd7NO1yUNQEjRjeN9hoNkv+FSbA4MNiKxa9FpQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2013-05-22 11:49 ` Rainer Orth 2013-05-22 12:40 ` Jakub Jelinek 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Rainer Orth @ 2013-05-22 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anthony Green; +Cc: Andrew Haley, libffi-discuss, gcc-patches, Jakub Jelinek Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com> writes: > Rainer - sorry, I've been travelling and falling behind on email. > This patch is fine. Please commit it to GCC. I'll put it in the > libffi git tree. No worries, I just saw your vacation note. I've commited to mainline now. Jakub, what should we do about the 4.8 branch? Wait until 4.8.1 is released or apply now? This is a regression from 4.7. Thanks. Rainer > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 05/22/2013 10:55 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > > The following libffi patch > > > > [libffi] Fix several libffi testsuite failures on 64-bit > SPARC and PowerPC (PR libffi/56033) > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg00840.html > > > > has remained unreviewed for a week. It needs a libffi > maintainer, which > > I suppose Anthony still is, despite not being listed in > MAINTAINERS. > > Forwarding to libffi. > > > > > > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed libffi patch 2013-05-22 11:49 ` Rainer Orth @ 2013-05-22 12:40 ` Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-22 12:45 ` Rainer Orth 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2013-05-22 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rainer Orth; +Cc: Anthony Green, Andrew Haley, libffi-discuss, gcc-patches On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:49:47PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: > Jakub, what should we do about the 4.8 branch? Wait until 4.8.1 is > released or apply now? This is a regression from 4.7. You can apply it now. Jakub ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed libffi patch 2013-05-22 12:40 ` Jakub Jelinek @ 2013-05-22 12:45 ` Rainer Orth 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Rainer Orth @ 2013-05-22 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Anthony Green, Andrew Haley, libffi-discuss, gcc-patches Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:49:47PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote: >> Jakub, what should we do about the 4.8 branch? Wait until 4.8.1 is >> released or apply now? This is a regression from 4.7. > > You can apply it now. Done, thanks. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <yddpqmg5tgk.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>]
* Re: Unreviewed libffi patch [not found] <yddpqmg5tgk.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> @ 2011-06-14 15:38 ` Andrew Haley 2011-06-14 16:02 ` Rainer Orth 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Andrew Haley @ 2011-06-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-patches; +Cc: libffi-discuss On 06/14/2011 04:22 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: > The following patch has remained unreviewed for a week: I think it wasn't cc'd to libffi-discuss@sourceware.org > [libffi] Fix libffi.call/huge_struct.c on Tru64 UNIX > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00644.html > > It needs a libffi maintainer or global reviewer. This is OK. Andrew. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Unreviewed libffi patch 2011-06-14 15:38 ` Andrew Haley @ 2011-06-14 16:02 ` Rainer Orth 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Rainer Orth @ 2011-06-14 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Haley; +Cc: gcc-patches, libffi-discuss Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes: > On 06/14/2011 04:22 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: >> The following patch has remained unreviewed for a week: > > I think it wasn't cc'd to libffi-discuss@sourceware.org Right, I hadn't known/had forgotten about that since all my libffi fixes happen in GCC context. I'd only Cc'ed it to Anthony, but he isn't listed as libffi maintainer in MAINTAINERS anymore as I just noticed. >> [libffi] Fix libffi.call/huge_struct.c on Tru64 UNIX >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00644.html >> >> It needs a libffi maintainer or global reviewer. > > This is OK. Installed, thanks. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-22 12:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <yddk3mrtk3k.fsf@lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2013-05-22 9:58 ` Unreviewed libffi patch Andrew Haley [not found] ` <CACxje59X_rLcSd7NO1yUNQEjRjeN9hoNkv+FSbA4MNiKxa9FpQ@mail.gmail.com> 2013-05-22 11:49 ` Rainer Orth 2013-05-22 12:40 ` Jakub Jelinek 2013-05-22 12:45 ` Rainer Orth [not found] <yddpqmg5tgk.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-06-14 15:38 ` Andrew Haley 2011-06-14 16:02 ` Rainer Orth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).