* [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs
@ 2022-04-14 10:29 Jonathan Wakely
2022-04-14 10:36 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2022-04-14 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libstdc++, gcc-patches; +Cc: Richard Biener
This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1
and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix.
-- >8 --
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml: Refer to GCC 11 not
mainline.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml: Likewise.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml: Likewise.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml: Likewise.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml: Likewise.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml: Likewise.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml: Likewise.
* doc/html/manual/status.html: Regenerate.
---
libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/status.html | 24 ++++++++-----------
.../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml | 3 +--
.../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml | 3 +--
.../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml | 4 ++--
.../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml | 4 ++--
.../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml | 4 ++--
libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml | 3 +--
.../doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml | 3 +--
8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
index 792272bcf26..f1be6667cd7 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
@@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2003.
</para>
<para>
-This section describes the C++ support in mainline GCC, not in any
-particular release.
+This section describes the C++ support in the GCC 11 release series.
</para>
<!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml
index 88844f8f0cc..e06f2479763 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml
@@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2011.
</para>
<para>
-This section describes the C++11 support in mainline GCC, not in any
-particular release.
+This section describes the C++11 support in the GCC 11 release series.
</para>
<!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml
index 5dc287707d8..deb15c7f0d5 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ since C++11 and the implementation is complete.
</para>
<para>
-This section describes the C++14 and library TS support in mainline GCC,
-not in any particular release.
+This section describes the C++14 and library TS support in the GCC 11
+release series.
</para>
<!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml
index 11372bb28b3..52bbce0a2be 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ since that release.
</para>
<para>
-This section describes the C++17 and library TS support in mainline GCC,
-not in any particular release.
+This section describes the C++17 and library TS support in the GCC 11
+release series.
</para>
<para>
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml
index 9e9777ea85f..411a337c534 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ presence of the required flag.
</para>
<para>
-This section describes the C++20 and library TS support in mainline GCC,
-not in any particular release.
+This section describes the C++20 and library TS support in the GCC 11
+release series.
</para>
<para>
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml
index 021cb6394a7..6533857ba12 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml
@@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ In this implementation the header names are prefixed by
</para>
<para>
-This page describes the TR1 support in mainline GCC, not in any particular
-release.
+This page describes the TR1 support in the GCC 11 release series.
</para>
<!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml
index 139b94442e8..4b6d64c7c6a 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ decimal floating-point arithmetic
</para>
<para>
-This page describes the TR 24733 support in mainline GCC, not in any
-particular release.
+This page describes the TR 24733 support in the GCC 11 release series.
</para>
<!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs
2022-04-14 10:29 [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs Jonathan Wakely
@ 2022-04-14 10:36 ` Richard Biener
2022-04-14 10:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2022-04-14 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Wakely; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc-patches
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
> docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
>
> Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1
> and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix.
Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch
but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;)
Richard.
> -- >8 --
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml: Refer to GCC 11 not
> mainline.
> * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml: Likewise.
> * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml: Likewise.
> * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml: Likewise.
> * doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml: Likewise.
> * doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml: Likewise.
> * doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml: Likewise.
> * doc/html/manual/status.html: Regenerate.
> ---
> libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/status.html | 24 ++++++++-----------
> .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml | 3 +--
> .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml | 3 +--
> .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml | 4 ++--
> .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml | 4 ++--
> .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml | 4 ++--
> libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml | 3 +--
> .../doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml | 3 +--
> 8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
> index 792272bcf26..f1be6667cd7 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml
> @@ -18,8 +18,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2003.
> </para>
>
> <para>
> -This section describes the C++ support in mainline GCC, not in any
> -particular release.
> +This section describes the C++ support in the GCC 11 release series.
> </para>
>
> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml
> index 88844f8f0cc..e06f2479763 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml
> @@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ This status table is based on the table of contents of ISO/IEC 14882:2011.
> </para>
>
> <para>
> -This section describes the C++11 support in mainline GCC, not in any
> -particular release.
> +This section describes the C++11 support in the GCC 11 release series.
> </para>
>
> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml
> index 5dc287707d8..deb15c7f0d5 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml
> @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ since C++11 and the implementation is complete.
> </para>
>
> <para>
> -This section describes the C++14 and library TS support in mainline GCC,
> -not in any particular release.
> +This section describes the C++14 and library TS support in the GCC 11
> +release series.
> </para>
>
> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml
> index 11372bb28b3..52bbce0a2be 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml
> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ since that release.
> </para>
>
> <para>
> -This section describes the C++17 and library TS support in mainline GCC,
> -not in any particular release.
> +This section describes the C++17 and library TS support in the GCC 11
> +release series.
> </para>
>
> <para>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml
> index 9e9777ea85f..411a337c534 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2020.xml
> @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ presence of the required flag.
> </para>
>
> <para>
> -This section describes the C++20 and library TS support in mainline GCC,
> -not in any particular release.
> +This section describes the C++20 and library TS support in the GCC 11
> +release series.
> </para>
>
> <para>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml
> index 021cb6394a7..6533857ba12 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr1.xml
> @@ -22,8 +22,7 @@ In this implementation the header names are prefixed by
> </para>
>
> <para>
> -This page describes the TR1 support in mainline GCC, not in any particular
> -release.
> +This page describes the TR1 support in the GCC 11 release series.
> </para>
>
> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml
> index 139b94442e8..4b6d64c7c6a 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxxtr24733.xml
> @@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ decimal floating-point arithmetic
> </para>
>
> <para>
> -This page describes the TR 24733 support in mainline GCC, not in any
> -particular release.
> +This page describes the TR 24733 support in the GCC 11 release series.
> </para>
>
> <!-- Status is Yes or No, Broken/Partial-->
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs
2022-04-14 10:36 ` Richard Biener
@ 2022-04-14 10:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-04-14 10:55 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2022-04-14 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Biener; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc Patches
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
> > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
> >
> > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1
> > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix.
>
> Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch
> but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;)
Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11.
I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes)
and have now pushed r11-9881
as well.
Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs
2022-04-14 10:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
@ 2022-04-14 10:55 ` Richard Biener
2022-04-14 16:09 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2022-04-14 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Wakely; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc Patches
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
> > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
> > >
> > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1
> > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix.
> >
> > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch
> > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;)
>
> Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11.
>
> I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes)
> and have now pushed r11-9881
> as well.
>
> Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk!
Add an entry to branching.html!
Richard.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs
2022-04-14 10:55 ` Richard Biener
@ 2022-04-14 16:09 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-04-19 7:01 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2022-04-14 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Biener; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc Patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1015 bytes --]
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
> > > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
> > > >
> > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1
> > > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix.
> > >
> > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch
> > > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;)
> >
> > Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11.
> >
> > I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes)
> > and have now pushed r11-9881
> > as well.
> >
> > Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk!
>
> Add an entry to branching.html!
Like this? OK for wwwdocs?
[-- Attachment #2: patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 742 bytes --]
commit 7789dd25ce48039d9b6459340051e403f1f8b309
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Apr 14 17:08:34 2022 +0100
Update branching.html with reminder for libstdc++ docs
diff --git a/htdocs/branching.html b/htdocs/branching.html
index f30a47e1..ff28eb51 100644
--- a/htdocs/branching.html
+++ b/htdocs/branching.html
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ git push origin tag basepoints/gcc-11
for the next major release in the <code>wwwdocs</code> repository and
populate it with initial copies of <code>changes.html</code> and
<code>criteria.html</code>.</li>
+
+<li>Libstdc++ maintainers should update references to "mainline GCC" in
+<code>libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/status_cxx*.xml</code>.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Web Site Updates</h2>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs
2022-04-14 16:09 ` Jonathan Wakely
@ 2022-04-19 7:01 ` Richard Biener
2022-04-19 10:40 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2022-04-19 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Wakely; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc Patches
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
> > > > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
> > > > >
> > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1
> > > > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch
> > > > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;)
> > >
> > > Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11.
> > >
> > > I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes)
> > > and have now pushed r11-9881
> > > as well.
> > >
> > > Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk!
> >
> > Add an entry to branching.html!
>
> Like this? OK for wwwdocs?
Maybe
"Notify libstdc++ maintainers to update ..."
?
OK with that change.
Richard.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs
2022-04-19 7:01 ` Richard Biener
@ 2022-04-19 10:40 ` Jonathan Wakely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2022-04-19 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Biener; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc Patches
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 08:01, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:55, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 11:36, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > This fixes some misleading text in the libstdc++ manual that says the
> > > > > > docs for the gcc-11 branch refer to mainline.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Richi, is this OK for the gcc-11 branch now? It's been wrong for 11.1
> > > > > > and 11.2, but it would still be nice to fix.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, it's OK. I notice the same problem exists on the GCC 10 branch
> > > > > but GCC 9 at least mentions GCC 9 once ;)
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I fixed it for gcc-9.3.0, but forgot to do it for gcc-10 and gcc-11.
> > > >
> > > > I pushed r10-10534 to fix gcc-10 (since that's open for doc changes)
> > > > and have now pushed r11-9881
> > > > as well.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe this year I'll remember to do it for gcc-12 after we branch from trunk!
> > >
> > > Add an entry to branching.html!
> >
> > Like this? OK for wwwdocs?
>
> Maybe
>
> "Notify libstdc++ maintainers to update ..."
>
> ?
>
> OK with that change.
Yes, that's better. Pushed with that change, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-19 10:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-14 10:29 [PATCH] libstdc++: Update incorrect statement about mainline in docs Jonathan Wakely
2022-04-14 10:36 ` Richard Biener
2022-04-14 10:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-04-14 10:55 ` Richard Biener
2022-04-14 16:09 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-04-19 7:01 ` Richard Biener
2022-04-19 10:40 ` Jonathan Wakely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).