public inbox for mauve-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* misleading output "PASS: Error: ..."
@ 2006-01-20 19:59 Edwin Steiner
  2006-01-22 17:50 ` Mark Wielaard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Edwin Steiner @ 2006-01-20 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mauve-discuss

Hallo!

During my work with tgolem I found many lines in the mauve output like
this:

PASS: gnu.testlet.java.lang.Byte.ByteTest: Error: test_Basics failed - 1 (number 1)

They are produced by such code:

                harness.check(!( Byte.MIN_VALUE != -128 ),
                        "Error: test_Basics failed - 1" );

Would you accept patches turning this into

                harness.check(!( Byte.MIN_VALUE != -128 ),
                        "test_Basics - 1" );

? (Only changing the string. Changing the double negation seems too
error prone for the many cases I found.)

BTW I already promised patches for a similar problem. Unfortunately I
had very little spare time recently. I hope this will get better now.

Cheers,
-Edwin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: misleading output "PASS: Error: ..."
  2006-01-20 19:59 misleading output "PASS: Error: ..." Edwin Steiner
@ 2006-01-22 17:50 ` Mark Wielaard
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Wielaard @ 2006-01-22 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Edwin Steiner; +Cc: mauve-discuss

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1095 bytes --]

Hi Edwin,

On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 20:59 +0100, Edwin Steiner wrote:
> During my work with tgolem I found many lines in the mauve output like
> this:
> 
> PASS: gnu.testlet.java.lang.Byte.ByteTest: Error: test_Basics failed - 1 (number 1)
> 
> They are produced by such code:
> 
>                 harness.check(!( Byte.MIN_VALUE != -128 ),
>                         "Error: test_Basics failed - 1" );
> 
> Would you accept patches turning this into
> 
>                 harness.check(!( Byte.MIN_VALUE != -128 ),
>                         "test_Basics - 1" );
> 
> ? (Only changing the string. Changing the double negation seems too
> error prone for the many cases I found.)

Yes please! I have found these message strings confusing myself in the
past. If you do decide to change the double negation then please rewrite
these as actual checks:

    harness.check(Byte.MIN_VALUE, -128, "test_Basics - 1" );

That way one sees the expected value if the the test would ever fail.
But just changing the message strings would already be an improvement.

Cheers,

Mark

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-22 17:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-20 19:59 misleading output "PASS: Error: ..." Edwin Steiner
2006-01-22 17:50 ` Mark Wielaard

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).