* patch committal.
@ 2004-05-02 12:17 Thomas Zander
2004-05-02 12:50 ` Andrew Haley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zander @ 2004-05-02 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mauve-discuss
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm (again) feeling a tad frustrated that nobody is available to commit or
even comment on my patches.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2004-q2/msg00050.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2004-q2/msg00051.html
I've requested a cvs account several times; but have not even received the
courtesy of a yes/no answer.
Any suggestions on how to get this to move forward again? I have a
(graphical) redisign for the website here, I started some tests, but all
in all it just does not seem worth it if the reply-cycle is this long.
I'm just about ready to give up here..
- --
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAlOaiCojCW6H2z/QRAgnyAKDZiZ73/v7dLkRPjOe4mpyOg+LdegCfW6nK
2cb7oACp0KiCY5EsWrK6zLk=
=0frK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* patch committal.
2004-05-02 12:17 patch committal Thomas Zander
@ 2004-05-02 12:50 ` Andrew Haley
2004-05-02 15:05 ` Thomas Zander
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2004-05-02 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zander; +Cc: mauve-discuss
Thomas Zander writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm (again) feeling a tad frustrated that nobody is available to commit or
> even comment on my patches.
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2004-q2/msg00050.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/mauve-discuss/2004-q2/msg00051.html
There are okay, I think.
> I've requested a cvs account several times; but have not even
> received the courtesy of a yes/no answer.
We should get you a CVS account. However, your opinion that "its more
important to have people creating patches and moving the project
forward then to always have a 100% correct CVS" makes people worried.
> Any suggestions on how to get this to move forward again? I have a
> (graphical) redisign for the website here, I started some tests,
> but all in all it just does not seem worth it if the reply-cycle is
> this long.
>
> I'm just about ready to give up here..
You should get CVS access, I think, but of course you'll still need to
post patches here for pre-commit discussion. Everybody does that.
There were problems with your patches. I fixed the problems by hand.
Please don't provide he ChangeLog as a diff: it won't apply anyway. I
have committed both these patches. Please check they're OK.
Andrew.
$ patch -p0 < ~/zander.1
patching file `ChangeLog'
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to ChangeLog.rej
patching file `gnu/testlet/java/beans/Introspector/jdk12.java'
patching file `gnu/testlet/java/security//AlgorithmParameterGenerator/MauveAlgorithm.java'
patching file `gnu/testlet/java/security//AlgorithmParameters/MauveAlgorithm.java'
patching file `gnu/testlet/java/security//KeyFactory/MauveAlgorithm.java'
patching file `gnu/testlet/java/security//KeyPairGenerator/MauveAlgorithm.java'
$ patch -p0 < ~/zander.2
patching file `ChangeLog'
patch: **** malformed patch at line 91: Index: build.xml
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: patch committal.
2004-05-02 12:50 ` Andrew Haley
@ 2004-05-02 15:05 ` Thomas Zander
2004-05-02 23:49 ` C. Brian Jones
2004-05-04 10:27 ` Andrew Haley
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zander @ 2004-05-02 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mauve-discuss
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 02 May 2004 14:49, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Thomas Zander writes:
> > I've requested a cvs account several times; but have not even
> > received the courtesy of a yes/no answer.
>
> We should get you a CVS account. However, your opinion that "its more
> important to have people creating patches and moving the project
> forward then to always have a 100% correct CVS" makes people worried.
That statement was discussed and I learned that mauve does not have any
sort of release cycle in which bugs can be fixed. Its 'released' as a
final product in CVS on a daily basis, so to say.
I agree that that takes a slightly different approach.
> You should get CVS access, I think,
That would be nice; anyone I can contact?
> but of course you'll still need to
> post patches here for pre-commit discussion. Everybody does that.
No problem, if you think that helps :-)
> There were problems with your patches. I fixed the problems by hand.
> Please don't provide he ChangeLog as a diff: it won't apply anyway. I
> have committed both these patches. Please check they're OK.
After a CVS update I indeed found no file to be modified anymore. Thanx!
- --
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAlQ3pCojCW6H2z/QRAoS9AJwK00dYdrXqsJSZT6YkKEIQn9GfyQCg6jTA
bND9ONOOzSpYFiJybbWTmhI=
=GsIw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: patch committal.
2004-05-02 15:05 ` Thomas Zander
@ 2004-05-02 23:49 ` C. Brian Jones
2004-05-04 10:27 ` Andrew Haley
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: C. Brian Jones @ 2004-05-02 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zander; +Cc: mauve-discuss
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1516 bytes --]
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 11:04, Thomas Zander wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 02 May 2004 14:49, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Thomas Zander writes:
> > > I've requested a cvs account several times; but have not even
> > > received the courtesy of a yes/no answer.
> >
> > We should get you a CVS account. However, your opinion that "its more
> > important to have people creating patches and moving the project
> > forward then to always have a 100% correct CVS" makes people worried.
>
> That statement was discussed and I learned that mauve does not have any
> sort of release cycle in which bugs can be fixed. Its 'released' as a
> final product in CVS on a daily basis, so to say.
> I agree that that takes a slightly different approach.
>
> > You should get CVS access, I think,
> That would be nice; anyone I can contact?
>
> > but of course you'll still need to
> > post patches here for pre-commit discussion. Everybody does that.
> No problem, if you think that helps :-)
>
> > There were problems with your patches. I fixed the problems by hand.
> > Please don't provide he ChangeLog as a diff: it won't apply anyway. I
> > have committed both these patches. Please check they're OK.
>
> After a CVS update I indeed found no file to be modified anymore. Thanx!
Tom Tromey can get you access. Mauve has a fairly relaxed commit
policy, basically adding/fixing tests good, changing anything else
requires discussion.
Brian
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: patch committal.
2004-05-02 15:05 ` Thomas Zander
2004-05-02 23:49 ` C. Brian Jones
@ 2004-05-04 10:27 ` Andrew Haley
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2004-05-04 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zander; +Cc: mauve-discuss
Thomas Zander writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 02 May 2004 14:49, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Thomas Zander writes:
> > > I've requested a cvs account several times; but have not even
> > > received the courtesy of a yes/no answer.
> >
> > We should get you a CVS account. However, your opinion that "its more
> > important to have people creating patches and moving the project
> > forward then to always have a 100% correct CVS" makes people worried.
>
> That statement was discussed and I learned that mauve does not have
> any sort of release cycle in which bugs can be fixed. Its
> 'released' as a final product in CVS on a daily basis, so to say.
> I agree that that takes a slightly different approach.
Cool.
> > You should get CVS access, I think,
> That would be nice; anyone I can contact?
Tromey should be listening, and AFAICR he holds the keys. Tom, you
there?
> > but of course you'll still need to
> > post patches here for pre-commit discussion. Everybody does that.
> No problem, if you think that helps :-)
Oh yes.
Andrew.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-04 10:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-02 12:17 patch committal Thomas Zander
2004-05-02 12:50 ` Andrew Haley
2004-05-02 15:05 ` Thomas Zander
2004-05-02 23:49 ` C. Brian Jones
2004-05-04 10:27 ` Andrew Haley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).