public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Fwd: CVS write access
@ 2003-08-20 17:28 Bernardo Innocenti
  2003-08-20 17:41 ` Christopher Faylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bernardo Innocenti @ 2003-08-20 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: overseers

Hello,

David Edelsohn suggested me to forward my request here:


----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: CVS write access
Date: Wednesday 20 August 2003 19:14
From: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@develer.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, sourcemaster@sources.redhat.com

Hello,

I have a few approved m68k patches still not committed and several
more still pending submission.

On August 14, I've applied for CVS write access using the web form on
sources.redhat.com, and I've still got no confirmation.

Since September, I'll be buried with my regular work and unable to
contribute much to GCC. I still hope to be able to merge-in all the bits
required to properly support ColdFire and uClinux targets in time for
the 3.4 release.

Richard, if it turns out to take much more time, would you mind
committing those patches for me? I could post the complete list sorted
by dependency.

--
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/

Please don't send Word attachments -
 http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/

Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: CVS write access
  2003-08-20 17:28 Fwd: CVS write access Bernardo Innocenti
@ 2003-08-20 17:41 ` Christopher Faylor
  2003-08-20 18:05   ` Bernardo Innocenti
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-08-20 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bernardo Innocenti; +Cc: overseers

On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 07:28:34PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>Hello,
>
>David Edelsohn suggested me to forward my request here:
>
>
>----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
>
>Subject: CVS write access
>Date: Wednesday 20 August 2003 19:14
>From: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@develer.com>
>To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, sourcemaster@sources.redhat.com
>
>Hello,
>
>I have a few approved m68k patches still not committed and several
>more still pending submission.
>
>On August 14, I've applied for CVS write access using the web form on
>sources.redhat.com, and I've still got no confirmation.

That's because you used "bernie@gcc.gnu.org" as your email address when
you submitted the form.  That is obviously an invalid email address.

Please fill out the form again and use your correct email address.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: CVS write access
  2003-08-20 17:41 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-08-20 18:05   ` Bernardo Innocenti
  2003-08-20 18:12     ` Christopher Faylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bernardo Innocenti @ 2003-08-20 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: overseers

On Wednesday 20 August 2003 19:41, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> >On August 14, I've applied for CVS write access using the web form on
> >sources.redhat.com, and I've still got no confirmation.
>
> That's because you used "bernie@gcc.gnu.org" as your email address when
> you submitted the form.  That is obviously an invalid email address.
>

Oh, I misunderstood the instructions. Point 3 is a bit misleading IMHO:

 1. First and last name 
 2. Preferred login name 
 3. A forwarding e-mail address (where mail should go if it is sent to you @sources.redhat.com or @gcc.gnu.org)
 4. What project this is for ("gdb", "automake", "gnats", etc.) 
 5. Who approved your access 
 6. An SSH public key, generated with ssh-keygen 


> Please fill out the form again and use your correct email address.

 I will.

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/

Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: CVS write access
  2003-08-20 18:05   ` Bernardo Innocenti
@ 2003-08-20 18:12     ` Christopher Faylor
  2003-08-20 18:22       ` Bernardo Innocenti
  2003-08-20 18:34       ` Per Bothner
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-08-20 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bernardo Innocenti; +Cc: overseers

On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:05:36PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>On Wednesday 20 August 2003 19:41, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> >On August 14, I've applied for CVS write access using the web form on
>> >sources.redhat.com, and I've still got no confirmation.
>>
>> That's because you used "bernie@gcc.gnu.org" as your email address when
>> you submitted the form.  That is obviously an invalid email address.
>>
>
>Oh, I misunderstood the instructions. Point 3 is a bit misleading IMHO:
>
> 1. First and last name 
> 2. Preferred login name 
> 3. A forwarding e-mail address (where mail should go if it is sent to you @sources.redhat.com or @gcc.gnu.org)
> 4. What project this is for ("gdb", "automake", "gnats", etc.) 
> 5. Who approved your access 
> 6. An SSH public key, generated with ssh-keygen 

"A forwarding email address" is misleading?  It's a pretty standard
concept, or at least it should be for the target audience.

cgf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: CVS write access
  2003-08-20 18:12     ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-08-20 18:22       ` Bernardo Innocenti
  2003-08-20 18:34       ` Per Bothner
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bernardo Innocenti @ 2003-08-20 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: overseers

On Wednesday 20 August 2003 20:12, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> "A forwarding email address" is misleading?  It's a pretty standard
> concept, or at least it should be for the target audience.

It's the same I've been using on SF... Ok, it's been kinda stupid
of me :-)

-- 
  // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/  http://www.develer.com/

Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: CVS write access
  2003-08-20 18:12     ` Christopher Faylor
  2003-08-20 18:22       ` Bernardo Innocenti
@ 2003-08-20 18:34       ` Per Bothner
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Per Bothner @ 2003-08-20 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: Bernardo Innocenti, overseers

Christopher Faylor wrote:

>>3. A forwarding e-mail address (where mail should go if it is sent to you @sources.redhat.com or @gcc.gnu.org)
> 
> "A forwarding email address" is misleading?  It's a pretty standard
> concept, or at least it should be for the target audience.

True, but to make it even more difficult to misunderstand:

A valid email address.  (Mail sent to your-login@sources.redhat.com
or your-login@gcc.gnu.org will be forwarded to this address.)
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-20 18:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-20 17:28 Fwd: CVS write access Bernardo Innocenti
2003-08-20 17:41 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-08-20 18:05   ` Bernardo Innocenti
2003-08-20 18:12     ` Christopher Faylor
2003-08-20 18:22       ` Bernardo Innocenti
2003-08-20 18:34       ` Per Bothner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).