public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@elastic.org>,
	Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
		"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	Overseers <overseers@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: GCC Bugzilla accounts
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 14:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWvnynniipgPJhU-MuKcDqNT5r0BeRiEp2RCZKSfg9YBJOjmQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170601144432.GB4001@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Christopher Faylor
<cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:18:57PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>On Wed, 31 May 2017, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>>> > There certainly are people who send html-only email to overseers asking
>>> > to have an account created.  That is an issue that they can fix for
>>> > themselves and many do.
>>>
>>> Is there a reason that mail to overseers must reject HTML-only email?
>>> Or maybe we need a separate email alias for GCC Bugzilla account
>>> requests without the restriction.
>>
>>Indeed, HTML email is the norm nowadays, and we should not expect users
>>(as opposed to developers) to need to reconfigure their email clients to
>>avoid sending it to be able to report bugs; we should work with the world
>>as it is rather than making users jump through arbitrary hoops.
>>
>>I think that both any address used for Bugzilla account requests, and
>>*-help list addresses explicitly aimed at users seeking help rather than
>>developers contributing to Sourceware-hosted projects, should accept HTML
>>email and have more relaxed spam filtering than the main development
>>lists.
>
> Sending email, whether it's html formatted or not, and waiting for the
> amazingly-dedicated-but-human fche to deal with every request is not
> ideal or scalable.  overseers was not intended to be a public place
> where newbs send email.  If we really need to keep using this method,
> and html is a barrier, then we need a new mailing list, populated with
> gcc people, taking Frank out of the loop.  We could just set up an
> email alias that forwarded requests to individuals without actually
> setting up a full-featured mailing list.

If we solicited new volunteers from the GCC community to review GCC
Bugzilla account requests, can we easily and conveniently provide
those volunteers with privileges to create / approve GCC Bugzilla
accounts?  This could be an opportunity to grow the GNU Toolchain
developer community with important but non-programming tasks.

Thanks, David

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-01 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-25 16:07 David Edelsohn
2017-05-25 16:26 ` Joseph Myers
2017-05-25 16:37   ` Carlos O'Donell
2017-05-25 16:41     ` Joseph Myers
2017-05-25 20:16       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2017-05-25 20:35         ` Gerald Pfeifer
2017-05-25 21:36           ` Frédéric Buclin via overseers
2017-05-31 11:54         ` David Edelsohn
2017-05-31 12:38           ` Carlos O'Donell
2017-05-31 12:41             ` David Edelsohn
2017-05-31 13:14               ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2017-05-31 13:22                 ` David Edelsohn
2017-05-31 14:39                   ` Christopher Faylor
2017-05-31 14:49                     ` David Edelsohn
2017-06-01 14:19                       ` Joseph Myers
2017-06-01 14:44                         ` Christopher Faylor
2017-06-01 14:53                           ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2017-06-01 19:56                             ` Christopher Faylor
2017-06-05 15:39                               ` David Edelsohn
2017-06-05 15:49                                 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2017-06-16 22:02                             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2017-06-17 12:07                               ` David Edelsohn
2017-06-20 22:40                               ` David Edelsohn
2017-06-21 22:02                                 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2017-06-23 13:39                                   ` David Edelsohn
2017-07-13 18:29                                   ` David Edelsohn
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-12 15:53 gcc bugzilla accounts Damien Ruscoe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGWvnynniipgPJhU-MuKcDqNT5r0BeRiEp2RCZKSfg9YBJOjmQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@elastic.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).