public inbox for xconq7@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Elijah Meeks <elijahmeeks@yahoo.com>,
	 xconq7 <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: CXP???
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <412F5B74.2040602@phy.cmich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040827050942.5961.qmail@web13122.mail.yahoo.com>

Elijah Meeks wrote:
> I have yet to see a unit gain experience from a
> fire-action, except in cases where the unit it's
> firing on is adjacent.

It would seem that someone was a bit sloppy with the code, and 
"recycled" the 'chance' variable for determining retreat chance, after 
using it for hit chance. So, if the defender's retreat chance is 0% (the 
default), then no combat experience is gained. This is a bug by any 
other name. I will fix it in my sources. Until you have a new Xconq 
release to play with, I would recommend that you set the 
'retreat-chance' to 1% for all units (unless you wish them have a higher 
retreat chance for other reasons); this weird hack should allow for 
combat experience to be gained.

> I think, barring seperate tables for cxp-per-attack,
> cxp-per-hit, cxp-per-defend, cxp-per-capture and
> cxp-per destruction, I say keep it all as cxp for each
> attack and keep it two-way.  You should get experience
> for surviving certain attacks but, of course, it would
> seem more realistic if you were able to tailor them.

This is what I was getting at. However, I plan on leaving things the way 
they are for the time being.

Eric

       reply	other threads:[~2004-08-27 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20040827050942.5961.qmail@web13122.mail.yahoo.com>
2004-08-27 17:09 ` Eric McDonald [this message]
2004-08-28  2:51   ` CXP??? Elijah Meeks
2004-08-28  3:47     ` Multiple Image Use Elijah Meeks
2004-08-28  4:02       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-28  4:33         ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-01  7:30         ` Standard Game Graphics Elijah Meeks
2004-09-01 16:18           ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-01 18:30             ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-02  1:43               ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-02  4:24                 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-03  2:30                 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-03  3:01                   ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-03  3:17                     ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-03  5:10                       ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-03  5:11                         ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-03  6:10                         ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-03 17:18                           ` Changing the Standard Game Elijah Meeks
2004-09-04  2:06                             ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-04 17:46                             ` Lincoln Peters
2004-09-05  1:48                               ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05  6:02                                 ` Feature Request: Advance Prohibits Advance Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 16:25                                   ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 16:41                                     ` mskala
2004-09-05 16:54                                       ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 17:11                                         ` mskala
2004-09-05 17:01                                       ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 16:48                                     ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 19:43                                       ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 16:50                                     ` mskala
2004-09-05 16:55                                       ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 16:55                                   ` Lincoln Peters
2004-09-05 17:01                                     ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 19:52                                       ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-05 20:16                                         ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 19:58                                       ` Lincoln Peters
2004-09-05 20:15                                         ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 15:52                                 ` Changing the Standard Game Lincoln Peters
2004-09-05 16:36                                   ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 20:09                                     ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-05 20:14                                 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-05 20:40                                   ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 22:09                                   ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-03 23:11                         ` Standard Game Graphics Eric McDonald
2004-08-26 19:12 Three thoughts Eric McDonald
2004-08-26 22:08 ` CXP??? Elijah Meeks
2004-08-27  1:50   ` CXP??? Lincoln Peters
2004-08-27  5:10   ` CXP??? Eric McDonald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=412F5B74.2040602@phy.cmich.edu \
    --to=mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu \
    --cc=elijahmeeks@yahoo.com \
    --cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).