From: Elijah Meeks <elijahmeeks@yahoo.com>
To: Xconq list <xconq7@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Feature Request: Advance Prohibits Advance
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 06:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040905014819.70407.qmail@web13121.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4139FF56.9070801@phy.cmich.edu>
As it stands, there's no way to simulate different
tech paths. I'd like to have a way to shut off
advances if certain advances are researched, so that
sides can choose different directions to take. For
example, if we have two spacefaring societies, we can
have two techs, one being Ground War Focus and the
other Stellar War Focus. The side that pics Ground
War Focus spends less on developing AT-ATs and
Battlemechs and more for its Cordships and A-Wing
Starfighters while the other side has to pay extra to
develop its hovertanks but manages to design
galaxy-class starships and battlestars at a faster
rate.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-05 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040827050942.5961.qmail@web13122.mail.yahoo.com>
2004-08-27 17:09 ` CXP??? Eric McDonald
2004-08-28 2:51 ` CXP??? Elijah Meeks
2004-08-28 3:47 ` Multiple Image Use Elijah Meeks
2004-08-28 4:02 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-28 4:33 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-01 7:30 ` Standard Game Graphics Elijah Meeks
2004-09-01 16:18 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-01 18:30 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-02 1:43 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-02 4:24 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-03 2:30 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-03 3:01 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-03 3:17 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-03 5:10 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-03 5:11 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-03 6:10 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-03 17:18 ` Changing the Standard Game Elijah Meeks
2004-09-04 2:06 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-04 17:46 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-09-05 1:48 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 6:02 ` Elijah Meeks [this message]
2004-09-05 16:25 ` Feature Request: Advance Prohibits Advance Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 16:41 ` mskala
2004-09-05 16:54 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 17:11 ` mskala
2004-09-05 17:01 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 16:48 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 19:43 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 16:50 ` mskala
2004-09-05 16:55 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 16:55 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-09-05 17:01 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 19:52 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-05 20:16 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 19:58 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-09-05 20:15 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 15:52 ` Changing the Standard Game Lincoln Peters
2004-09-05 16:36 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-05 20:09 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-05 20:14 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-09-05 20:40 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-09-05 22:09 ` Eric McDonald
2004-09-03 23:11 ` Standard Game Graphics Eric McDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040905014819.70407.qmail@web13121.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=elijahmeeks@yahoo.com \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).