public inbox for xconq7@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric McDonald <mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu>
To: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Major bug and what to do about it (long)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408161742180.26801-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <l03130301bd46b33ac8ea@[212.181.162.155]>

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Hans Ronne wrote:

> Now the ball returns to the AI, who should find something else for our unit
> to do. However, the AI still sees the same unit view and doesn't know that
> the task failed, so it sets the same hit_unit task again. 

If the action check failed because the unit view doesn't not 
correspond to an actual unit at the given position, then the task 
logic should make a callback to the AI or UI to remove the unit 
view, IMO. This would break the cycle.

However, the unit should be penalized (in terms of ACP, 
material expenditure, etc...) for attempting the action on a 
"ghost" unit. I believe I have mentioned this before, either in 
private email or on the list. In that case, what motivated me to 
mention it was the fire-at-ghost-unit / fire-into cell case. I 
believe this was shortly after I made a fix so that one could not 
probe from cell to cell using the fire command to discover where 
hidden enemy units were.

I will reply in greater detail to some of your other thoughts 
after I get home tonight. There is a lot to carefully examine....

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-16 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-16 21:53 Hans Ronne
2004-08-16 22:14 ` Eric McDonald [this message]
2004-08-16 22:43   ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  0:33     ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  1:13       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  1:39         ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  2:21           ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  4:28           ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-17  5:17             ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 18:00               ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-18  5:26               ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-18 11:11                 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 16:14             ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  0:35     ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  1:16       ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  1:46         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  3:03           ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  3:56             ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  1:30 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  2:52   ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  2:53     ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  4:42       ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-17 16:37         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  4:48       ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 16:42         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-18 10:56         ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-17 11:06 ` Stan Shebs
2004-08-17 15:29   ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 16:01     ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 18:57       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17 20:38         ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 21:55           ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17 23:42             ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-18  0:49               ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-18  4:59                 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-18 15:28                   ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-19  6:37                     ` Elijah Meeks
2004-08-19 12:46                       ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-19 16:46                       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-19 13:09                     ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-19 16:05                       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-19 20:09                         ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-19 23:37                           ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-20  1:42                             ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-20  3:29                               ` Clearing the Air (long) Eric McDonald
2004-08-20 15:26                                 ` Stan Shebs
2004-08-18  5:30         ` Major bug and what to do about it (long) Jim Kingdon
2004-08-18 12:52           ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 18:23     ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17 18:47       ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 18:59         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17 19:39           ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 21:14             ` Eric McDonald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0408161742180.26801-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu \
    --to=mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu \
    --cc=hronne@comhem.se \
    --cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).