public inbox for xconq7@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Ronne <hronne@comhem.se>
To: Jim Kingdon <kingdon@panix.com>
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Major bug and what to do about it (long)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 05:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <l03130309bd4736028d5e@[212.181.162.155]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408170356.i7H3u5C15953@panix5.panix.com>

>> And this exploit is still possible, both in the tcltk interface and in the
>> mac interface. In effect, what it means is that you can attempt to fire at
>> unit views for free until you target a real unit, in which case the fire
>> action will execute and you will be charged.
>
>The attack into an empty cell exploit still exists with attack ("a").
>For example, in the standard game cruise around the ocean, trying to
>attack random sea cells.  One will eventually find a submarine.
>
>I haven't generally thought it is a particularly big deal, just
>because the AI doesn't know to exploit it and a human player won't
>have the patience to exploit it all that often.  But it would be nice
>to plug, if doing so doesn't cause other problems.

Interesting observation. What happens if you just move around in the ocean
without hitting 'a'? Woudn't you expect overrun actions to accomplish the
same thing, i.e. hit any units that are present in the cell, even if hidden
from view? Or are invisible units immune from overruns but not direct
attacks?

It would seem more logical to me if it was the other way around, that is if
direct attacks against invisible units were impossible while overrun
attacks were possible.

Hans


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-17  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-16 21:53 Hans Ronne
2004-08-16 22:14 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-16 22:43   ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  0:33     ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  1:13       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  1:39         ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  2:21           ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  4:28           ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-17  5:17             ` Hans Ronne [this message]
2004-08-17 18:00               ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-18  5:26               ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-18 11:11                 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 16:14             ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  0:35     ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  1:16       ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  1:46         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  3:03           ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  3:56             ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  1:30 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  2:52   ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17  2:53     ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  4:42       ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-17 16:37         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17  4:48       ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 16:42         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-18 10:56         ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-17 11:06 ` Stan Shebs
2004-08-17 15:29   ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 16:01     ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 18:57       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17 20:38         ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 21:55           ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17 23:42             ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-18  0:49               ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-18  4:59                 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-18 15:28                   ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-19  6:37                     ` Elijah Meeks
2004-08-19 12:46                       ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-19 16:46                       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-19 13:09                     ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-19 16:05                       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-19 20:09                         ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-19 23:37                           ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-20  1:42                             ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-20  3:29                               ` Clearing the Air (long) Eric McDonald
2004-08-20 15:26                                 ` Stan Shebs
2004-08-18  5:30         ` Major bug and what to do about it (long) Jim Kingdon
2004-08-18 12:52           ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 18:23     ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17 18:47       ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 18:59         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-17 19:39           ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-17 21:14             ` Eric McDonald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='l03130309bd4736028d5e@[212.181.162.155]' \
    --to=hronne@comhem.se \
    --cc=kingdon@panix.com \
    --cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).