From: Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net>
To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>,
Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
"gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Adding a SECURITY.md document to the Binutils
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:58:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A484AE1-77A9-47F4-A4F4-E8C5A333DB7C@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b526c591-760e-bec1-c267-019aae0fde36@foss.arm.com>
> On Apr 12, 2023, at 12:52 PM, Richard Earnshaw via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2023 17:26, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>> ...
>> Ack, I reckon this should be addressed by "corrupt output files from valid trusted inputs". If that's not clear enough, could you suggest alternative phrasing that makes it clearer?
>
> I'm not sure corrupt is general enough. Each instruction in the binary might be completely legal, but their sequencing could leave some vulnerabilities (think spectre, for example, but that's pretty extreme).
>
> Perhaps something like "... this means that the tools introduce a vulnerability in the output file that was not present in the input files being processed". I think with that wording you probably don't even need the last sentence in the first paragraph.
I agree. The scenario in "Reflections on trusting trust", Ken Thompson's famous paper, comes to mind. It might be worth adding that as a reference.
paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-07 8:42 Nick Clifton
2023-04-07 10:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-11 13:29 ` Nick Clifton
2023-04-11 14:23 ` Simon Marchi
2023-04-11 15:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-11 16:22 ` Nick Clifton
2023-04-11 16:32 ` Matt Rice
2023-04-11 18:18 ` J.W. Jagersma
2023-04-12 8:43 ` Nick Clifton
2023-04-08 6:30 ` Jan Beulich
2023-04-10 18:30 ` John Baldwin
2023-04-20 15:56 ` Nick Clifton
2023-04-11 19:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-12 16:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-12 16:26 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-12 16:52 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-12 16:58 ` Paul Koning [this message]
2023-04-12 17:10 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 3:51 ` Alan Modra
2023-04-13 4:25 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 5:16 ` Alan Modra
2023-04-13 12:00 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 10:25 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 11:53 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 12:37 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 12:54 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 13:11 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 13:35 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 13:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 13:56 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 14:50 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 15:02 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 15:05 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 16:42 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-14 9:52 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-14 12:43 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-14 12:49 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-14 13:13 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 15:08 ` Paul Koning
2023-04-13 16:02 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 16:49 ` Paul Koning
2023-04-13 17:00 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 17:05 ` Paul Koning
2023-04-13 17:29 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 17:37 ` Paul Koning
2023-04-13 18:16 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-14 17:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-14 18:27 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-14 20:46 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-14 21:24 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-17 15:31 ` Michael Matz
2023-04-17 19:55 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-14 19:45 ` DJ Delorie
2023-04-14 20:49 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-15 6:41 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-04-13 16:06 ` Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A484AE1-77A9-47F4-A4F4-E8C5A333DB7C@comcast.net \
--to=paulkoning@comcast.net \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
--cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).