From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] x86: adjust MOVSD attributes
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 14:21:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82a24463-2f28-5182-cab0-4867b177bdb5@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b45b6c58-e06a-2cef-ad97-0cb7956d3fd5@suse.com>
The non-SSE2AVX form of the SIMD variant of the instruction needlessly
has the (still multi-purpose) IgnoreSize attribute. All other similar
SSE2 insns use NoRex64 instead. Make this consistent, noting that the
SSE2AVX form can't have the same change made - there the memory operand
doesn't at the same time permit RegXMM (which logic uses when deciding
whether a Q suffix is okay outside of 64-bit mode).
--- a/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
+++ b/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
@@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ movmskpd<sse2>, 0x660f50, None, <sse2:cp
movntpd<sse2>, 0x660f2b, None, <sse2:cpu>, Modrm|<sse2:attr>|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { RegXMM, Xmmword|Unspecified|BaseIndex }
movsd, 0xf210, None, CpuAVX, D|Modrm|Vex=3|Space0F|VexW=1|IgnoreSize|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|SSE2AVX, { Qword|Unspecified|BaseIndex, RegXMM }
movsd, 0xf210, None, CpuAVX, D|Modrm|Vex=3|Space0F|VexVVVV=1|VexW=1|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|SSE2AVX, { RegXMM, RegXMM }
-movsd, 0xf20f10, None, CpuSSE2, D|Modrm|IgnoreSize|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Qword|Unspecified|BaseIndex|RegXMM, RegXMM }
+movsd, 0xf20f10, None, CpuSSE2, D|Modrm|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|NoRex64, { Qword|Unspecified|BaseIndex|RegXMM, RegXMM }
movupd<sse2>, 0x660f10, None, <sse2:cpu>, D|Modrm|<sse2:attr>|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { RegXMM|Unspecified|BaseIndex, RegXMM }
mulpd<sse2>, 0x660f59, None, <sse2:cpu>, Modrm|<sse2:attr>|<sse2:vvvv>|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { RegXMM|Unspecified|BaseIndex, RegXMM }
mulsd<sse2>, 0xf20f59, None, <sse2:cpu>, Modrm|<sse2:scal>|<sse2:vvvv>|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Qword|Unspecified|BaseIndex|RegXMM, RegXMM }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-05 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-05 12:17 [PATCH 00/12] x86: more templatization of insn templates Jan Beulich
2022-08-05 12:19 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86/Intel: split certain AVX512-FP16 VCVT*2PH templates Jan Beulich
2022-08-05 22:28 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:20 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86: allow use of broadcast with X/Y/Z-suffixed AVX512-FP16 insns Jan Beulich
2022-08-05 22:31 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:20 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86: fold AVX VGATHERDPD / VPGATHERDQ Jan Beulich
2022-08-05 22:32 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:21 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2022-08-05 22:46 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86: adjust MOVSD attributes H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:22 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86-64: adjust MOVQ to/from SReg attributes Jan Beulich
2022-08-05 23:00 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:23 ` [PATCH 06/12] revert "x86: Also pass -P to $(CPP) when processing i386-opc.tbl" Jan Beulich
2022-08-05 23:17 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-09 7:22 ` Jan Beulich
2022-08-08 12:49 ` Michael Matz
2022-08-09 7:33 ` Jan Beulich
2022-08-11 16:40 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:24 ` [PATCH 07/12] x86: template-ize packed/scalar vector floating point insns Jan Beulich
2022-08-05 23:07 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-11 1:12 ` Jiang, Haochen
2022-08-11 6:03 ` Jan Beulich
2022-08-11 16:38 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:25 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86: template-ize vector packed dword/qword integer insns Jan Beulich
2022-08-11 17:23 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-16 7:37 ` Jan Beulich
2022-08-16 15:53 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-16 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
2022-08-16 16:32 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:26 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86: re-order AVX512 S/G templates Jan Beulich
2022-08-11 17:24 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:27 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86: template-ize vector packed byte/word integer insns Jan Beulich
2022-08-11 17:38 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:28 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86: template-ize certain vector conversion insns Jan Beulich
2022-08-11 17:48 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-05 12:29 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86: shorten certain template names Jan Beulich
2022-08-11 17:49 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-12 11:33 ` [PATCH v1.1 06/12] revert "x86: Also pass -P to $(CPP) when processing i386-opc.tbl" Jan Beulich
2022-08-15 18:11 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82a24463-2f28-5182-cab0-4867b177bdb5@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).