From: "Cui, Lili" <lili.cui@intel.com>
To: "Beulich, Jan" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>,
"binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/8] Support APX GPR32 with extend evex prefix
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:44:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB5600D6FF13443E71707504D49ED5A@SJ0PR11MB5600.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa567d75-7d91-15ce-aa2b-cbfd087b0183@suse.com>
> Without seeing how this is used I can't comment on it. It feels though as if you
> may not have fully understood my earlier reply: Even prior to APX we already
> have cases where one CPU specifier in the opcode table using | means "both"
> and another means "either". I think we want to split that, and thus simplify
> the logic in cpu_flags_match(). That's separate prereq work, of course.
>
> Thing is that prior to 734dfd1cc966 this would have been prohibitively
> expensive in terms of table size growth. But now we can afford having two
> i386_cpu_attr fields, one meaning "all of these", the other meaning "any of
> these". To limit churn in the opcode table, I'd be inclined to continue to
> express CPU requirements in a single field there, using e.g.
> (CpuA|CpuB)&CpuC&CpuD (Cpu prefixes re-added here for clarity, even if
> they aren't present in the opcode table anymore).
>
> I'd be happy to do that prereq work (if we can agree on the approach), but it
> may mean a little bit of delay, as after my vacation I need to catch up with a
> few other thinghs first.
>
It would be great if you could do this (agree with the approach), it is not hurry, it may take a long time to commit the APX to the master.
> >>> + if (i.prefix[DATA_PREFIX] != 0)
> >
> >>> + {
> >
> >>> + i.tm.opcode_modifier.opcodeprefix = PREFIX_0X66;
> >
> >>> + i.prefix[DATA_PREFIX] = 0;
> >
> >>> + }
> >
> >>
> >
> >> While this looks to be correct for the case when the prefix was
> >> derived from an
> >
> >> insn template and the use of 16-bit operands, I don't think it is
> >> uniformly
> >
> >> correct when "data16" was used as a prefix explicitly. In such a case
> >> either
> >
> >> REX2 encoding needs to be used, or an error needs emitting.
> >
> >>
> >
> >> You may further want to assert that i.tm.opcode_modifier.opcodeprefix
> >> is still
> >
> >> zero ahead of the assignment.
> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > For REX2 encoding, we add no special handling, just follow REX.
> >
> > For EVEX-promoted encoding, such as “data16
> aand %r25d,0x123(%r31,%rax,4)”, the following existing code will report an
> error.
> >
> >
> >
> > if (is_any_vex_encoding (&i.tm)
> >
> > || i.tm.operand_types[i.imm_operands].bitfield.class >= RegMMX
> >
> > || i.tm.operand_types[i.imm_operands + 1].bitfield.class >=
> > RegMMX)
> >
> > {
> >
> > /* Check for data size prefix on VEX/XOP/EVEX encoded and SIMD
> > insns. */
> >
> > if (i.prefix[DATA_PREFIX])
> >
> > {
> >
> > as_bad (_("data size prefix invalid with `%s'"), insn_name
> > (&i.tm));
> >
> > return;
> >
> > }
>
> Thinking of it, I may need to revise my earlier comment some: RAO-INT insns
> are a bad example here, since despite being legacy-encoded they don't permit
> a data16 prefix to specify 16-bit operand size. Consider the same for e.g.
> AND. The legacy form permits use of data16 (leaving aside that it's better /
> clearer to simply use 16-bit register names), so the promoted forms likely
> ought to permit such as well. IOW perhaps the code you have is correct, but
> the check you quote may need adjusting.
>
I listed 5 instructions to check the data16 prefix, is the last one what you want?
$ cat add.s
and %ebx, %eax
data16 and %ebx, %eax
and %ebx, %r16d
data16 and %ebx, %r16d
{evex} data16 and %ebx, %r16d
$ objdump -dw and.o
0: 21 d8 and %ebx,%eax
2: 66 21 d8 and %bx,%ax
5: d5 10 21 d8 and %ebx,%r16d
9: 66 d5 10 21 d8 and %bx,%r16w
Error: data size prefix invalid with `and'
> >
> > I rebased master and as you predicted this doesn't work, one entry
> > contains both VEX and EVEX, VEX requires No_egpr=1 and EVEX requires
> > No_egpr=0,
> >
> > Finally I chose to add "No_egpr=1" for it. And added the following judgment
> in check_EgprOperands.
> >
> >
> >
> > check_EgprOperands (const insn_template *t)
> >
> > {
> >
> > - if (t->opcode_modifier.noegpr)
> >
> > if (t->opcode_modifier.noegpr && !need_evex_encoding())
>
> I'll need to look at this in context, so I can't comment right here.
>
> Also, just to mention it: Something's wrong with your reply (also visible in the
> list archive copy), harming readability quite a bit. There are extra blank lines
> between any two real ones.
>
Oh, sorry, I tried inserting a table into the email and changed it to HTML format, but forgot to change it back.
Thanks,
Lili.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-18 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 15:25 [PATCH 0/8] [RFC] Support Intel APX EGPR Cui, Lili
2023-09-19 15:25 ` [PATCH 1/8] Support APX GPR32 with rex2 prefix Cui, Lili
2023-09-21 15:27 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-27 15:57 ` Cui, Lili
2023-09-21 15:51 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-27 15:59 ` Cui, Lili
2023-09-28 8:02 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-07 3:27 ` Cui, Lili
2023-09-19 15:25 ` [PATCH 2/8] Support APX GPR32 with extend evex prefix Cui, Lili
2023-09-22 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-17 15:48 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-18 6:40 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-18 10:44 ` Cui, Lili [this message]
2023-10-18 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-22 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-17 15:50 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-17 16:11 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-18 2:02 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-18 6:10 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-25 6:03 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-17 15:52 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-17 16:12 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-18 6:31 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-18 6:47 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-18 7:52 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-18 8:21 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-18 11:30 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-19 11:58 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-19 15:24 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-19 16:38 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-20 6:25 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-22 14:33 ` Cui, Lili
2023-09-19 15:25 ` [PATCH 3/8] Add tests for " Cui, Lili
2023-09-27 13:11 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-17 15:53 ` FW: " Cui, Lili
2023-10-17 16:19 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-18 2:32 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-18 6:05 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-18 7:16 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-18 8:05 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-18 11:26 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-18 12:06 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-25 16:03 ` Cui, Lili
2023-09-27 13:19 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-19 15:25 ` [PATCH 4/8] Support APX NDD Cui, Lili
2023-09-27 14:44 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-22 14:05 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-23 7:12 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-25 8:10 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-25 8:47 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-25 15:49 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-25 15:59 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-28 7:57 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-22 14:57 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-24 11:39 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-24 11:58 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-25 15:29 ` Cui, Lili
2023-09-19 15:25 ` [PATCH 5/8] Support APX NDD optimized encoding Cui, Lili
2023-09-28 9:29 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-23 2:57 ` Hu, Lin1
2023-10-23 7:23 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-23 7:50 ` Hu, Lin1
2023-10-23 8:15 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-24 1:40 ` Hu, Lin1
2023-10-24 6:03 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-24 6:08 ` Hu, Lin1
2023-10-23 3:07 ` [PATCH-V2] " Hu, Lin1
2023-10-23 3:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] [v2] " Hu, Lin1
2023-10-23 7:26 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-19 15:25 ` [PATCH 6/8] Support APX Push2/Pop2 Cui, Lili
2023-09-28 11:37 ` Jan Beulich
2023-10-30 15:21 ` Cui, Lili
2023-10-30 15:31 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-20 13:05 ` Cui, Lili
2023-09-19 15:25 ` [PATCH 7/8] Support APX NF Cui, Lili
2023-09-25 6:07 ` Jan Beulich
2023-09-28 12:42 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-02 10:15 ` Cui, Lili
2023-11-02 10:23 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-02 10:46 ` Cui, Lili
2023-12-12 2:59 ` H.J. Lu
2023-09-19 15:25 ` [PATCH 8/8] Support APX JMPABS Cui, Lili
2023-09-28 13:11 ` Jan Beulich
2023-11-02 2:32 ` Hu, Lin1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SJ0PR11MB5600D6FF13443E71707504D49ED5A@SJ0PR11MB5600.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=lili.cui@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=hongjiu.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).