public inbox for dwz@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug default/24407] New: comment in partition_dups_1 does not match code
@ 2019-01-01  0:00 vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2019-01-01  0:00 ` [Bug default/24407] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2019-01-01  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dwz

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24407

            Bug ID: 24407
           Summary: comment in partition_dups_1 does not match code
           Product: dwz
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: default
          Assignee: nobody at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: dwz at sourceware dot org
  Target Milestone: ---

In partition_dups_1 there's some code:
...
      if (second_phase)
        {
          dw_die_ref next;
          for (k = i; k < j; k++)
            {
              if (arr[k]->die_dup != NULL)
                continue;
              for (ref = arr[k]; ref; ref = next)
                {
                  dw_cu_ref refcu = die_cu (ref);
                  next = ref->die_nextdup;
                  ref->die_dup = NULL;
                  ref->die_nextdup = NULL;
                  ref->die_remove = 0;
                  /* If there are dups within a single CU
                     (arguably a bug in the DWARF producer),
                     keep them linked together, but don't link
                     DIEs across different CUs.  */
                  while (next && refcu == die_cu (next))
                    {
                      dw_die_ref cur = next;
                      next = cur->die_nextdup;
                      cur->die_dup = ref;
                      cur->die_nextdup = ref->die_nextdup;
                      ref->die_nextdup = cur;
                    }
                }
            }
        }
...

If we have DIEs linked across 2 different CUs, indeed this code breaks the
link.

But if we have DIES linked across 3 different CUs, then this code breaks the
link between the first and the second, but not between the second and the
third.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug default/24407] comment in partition_dups_1 does not match code
  2019-01-01  0:00 [Bug default/24407] New: comment in partition_dups_1 does not match code vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2019-01-01  0:00 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2019-01-01  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dwz

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24407

Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Sorry, after more debugging, I realize I misunderstood the code.

[ Perhaps factoring out the two inner loops into an unlinks_dups function would
make things a bit more readable for me. ]

Marking as resolved-worksforme.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-01 17:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-01  0:00 [Bug default/24407] New: comment in partition_dups_1 does not match code vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2019-01-01  0:00 ` [Bug default/24407] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).