public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/110334] [13/14 Regresssion] unused functions not eliminated before LTO streaming Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 11:21:06 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-110334-4-UnyYSKFNVx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-110334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6) > Comdats are really in conflict with the fact that we have command line > options. I blame C++ standard for that and I don't think there is fully > satisfactory solution to this problem. > > I was playing with the idea of warning when at lto time when comdats have > different command line options, but this triggers way too often in practice. Really? :/ > We would need to determine "dangerous" one i.e. when -fno-avx2 is replaced > by -favx2 code. > There are many ways one can stubly change semantics of the IL which makes > merging possibly dangerous which is done often in larger projects, like > firefox. I think it would be desirable to diagnose these, maybe with an option to selectively disable this specific diagnostic. Because while it is not always a correctness issue it can be a performance issue as well. > With syntactic aliases it is possible to keep multiple copies of comdat > function through merging process so inlining will chose corresponding one, > but it does make other things harder. One important anoyance is that it > makes it a lot harder to estimate overall size of the translation unit and > how inlining affects it. We currently assume that every function will need > offline unless all calls to it disappears. We will need to understand that > this is true across all syntacit aliases. > > Also that conditional that disables early inliner for all always_inlines is > probably bit harmful these days as libstdc++ indeed has quite interesting > set of always_inlines that call normal inlines. I noticed that just recently > while looking into the push_back implementation how complex maze it got. > > I will fix early inliner to allow safe inlining to always_inlines. Beware of new always-inline calls then appearing after greedy inlining (though that's exactly the case that we try to avoid here). I suppose you could disable inlining of a function which contains always-inline calls or simply functions that did not yet have the early inliner run on them (so keep the current behavior in cycles). Beware of indirect always-inline calls then. Btw, for Skia the issue is really that some auto-generated CTOR isn't marked always-inline but everything else is. Maybe they should use flatten instead of always-inline ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-23 11:21 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-06-21 7:05 [Bug ipa/110334] New: " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-21 7:06 ` [Bug ipa/110334] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-21 7:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-21 7:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-22 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-22 11:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-22 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-23 10:47 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-23 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-06-23 12:59 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-23 13:07 ` Jan Hubicka 2023-06-23 13:07 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-26 6:39 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-06-26 17:50 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-27 6:41 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-06-28 10:00 ` Jan Hubicka 2023-06-28 4:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 10:00 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-28 10:20 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-06-28 10:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-28 21:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-03 7:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-10 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-10 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-10 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-11 14:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-07-11 14:46 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-07-12 7:05 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-07-27 9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-25 10:00 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-27 7:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-21 9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-110334-4-UnyYSKFNVx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).