public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/110334] [13/14 Regresssion] unused functions not eliminated before LTO streaming
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 11:21:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110334-4-UnyYSKFNVx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> Comdats are really in conflict with the fact that we have command line
> options. I blame C++ standard for that and I don't think there is fully
> satisfactory solution to this problem.
> 
> I was playing with the idea of warning when at lto time when comdats have
> different command line options, but this triggers way too often in practice.

Really? :/

> We would need to determine "dangerous" one i.e. when -fno-avx2 is replaced
> by -favx2 code. 
> There are many ways one can stubly change semantics of the IL which makes
> merging possibly dangerous which is done often in larger projects, like
> firefox.

I think it would be desirable to diagnose these, maybe with an option to
selectively disable this specific diagnostic.  Because while it is not
always a correctness issue it can be a performance issue as well.

> With syntactic aliases it is possible to keep multiple copies of comdat
> function through merging process so inlining will chose corresponding one,
> but it does make other things harder. One important anoyance is that it
> makes it a lot harder to estimate overall size of the translation unit and
> how inlining affects it. We currently assume that every function will need
> offline unless all calls to it disappears. We will need to understand that
> this is true across all syntacit aliases.
> 
> Also that conditional that disables early inliner for all always_inlines is
> probably bit harmful these days as libstdc++ indeed has quite interesting
> set of always_inlines that call normal inlines. I noticed that just recently
> while looking into the push_back implementation how complex maze it got.
> 
> I will fix early inliner to allow safe inlining to always_inlines.

Beware of new always-inline calls then appearing after greedy inlining
(though that's exactly the case that we try to avoid here).  I suppose
you could disable inlining of a function which contains always-inline
calls or simply functions that did not yet have the early inliner run
on them (so keep the current behavior in cycles).  Beware of indirect
always-inline calls then.

Btw, for Skia the issue is really that some auto-generated CTOR isn't
marked always-inline but everything else is.  Maybe they should use
flatten instead of always-inline ...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-23 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-21  7:05 [Bug ipa/110334] New: " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21  7:06 ` [Bug ipa/110334] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21  7:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21  7:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 11:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 10:47 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-06-23 12:59 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-06-23 13:07   ` Jan Hubicka
2023-06-23 13:07 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-06-26  6:39 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-26 17:50 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-06-27  6:41 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-28 10:00   ` Jan Hubicka
2023-06-28  4:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 10:00 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-06-28 10:20 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-28 10:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-06-28 21:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-03  7:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-10  7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-10  8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-10  8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-11 14:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-07-11 14:46 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-07-12  7:05 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-07-27  9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-25 10:00 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-27  7:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21  9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110334-4-UnyYSKFNVx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).