public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/110334] [13/14 Regresssion] unused functions not eliminated before LTO streaming
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 10:45:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110334-4-jpF7l08v2t@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> ---
> > We already have plenty of GF_CALL_ flags, so adding one should be easy?
>
> We have 3 bits left :/ I was hoping that cgraph_edge lives long
> enough? But I suppose we're not keeping them across the early opts
> pipeline.
Hmm, so we have too many flags. Indeed problem is that we don't want to
keep callgraph edges across all modifications gimple optimization passes
does.
Eventualy such annotations can probably go to hash_map just like we do
for EH regions etc.
Honza
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-28 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-21 7:05 [Bug ipa/110334] New: " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21 7:06 ` [Bug ipa/110334] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21 7:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-21 7:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 11:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 10:47 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 12:59 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-06-23 13:07 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-06-23 13:07 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-06-26 6:39 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-26 17:50 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-06-27 6:41 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-28 10:00 ` Jan Hubicka
2023-06-28 4:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 10:00 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-06-28 10:20 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-28 10:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz [this message]
2023-06-28 21:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-03 7:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-10 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-10 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-10 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-11 14:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-07-11 14:46 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2023-07-12 7:05 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-07-27 9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-25 10:00 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-27 7:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-21 9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-110334-4-jpF7l08v2t@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).