From: Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Jim Wilson <jimw@sifive.com>, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>,
Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] RISC-V: Provide programmatic implementation of CAS [PR 100266]
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:45:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210426124552.3316789-11-cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210426124552.3316789-1-cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org>
The existing CAS implementation uses an INSN definition, which provides
the core LR/SC sequence. Additionally to that, there is a follow-up code,
that evaluates the results and calculates the return values.
This has two drawbacks: a) an extension to sub-word CAS implementations
is not possible (even if, then it would be unmaintainable), and b) the
implementation is hard to maintain/improve.
This patch provides a programmatic implementation of CAS, similar
like many other architectures are having one.
The implementation supports both, RV32 and RV64.
Additionally, the implementation does not introduce data dependencies
for computation of the return value. Instead, we set the return value
(success state of the CAS operation) based on structural information.
This approach is also shown in the the RISC-V unpriv spec (as part
of the sample code for a compare-and-swap function using LR/SC).
The cost of this implementation is a single LI instruction on top,
which is actually not required in case of success (it will be
overwritten in the success case later).
The resulting sequence requires 9 instructions in the success case.
The previous implementation required 11 instructions in the succcess
case (including a taken branch) and had a "subw;seqz;beqz" sequence,
with direct dependencies.
Below is the generated code of a 32-bit CAS sequence with the old
implementation and the new implementation (ignore the ANDIs below).
Old:
f00: 419c lw a5,0(a1)
f02: 1005272f lr.w a4,(a0)
f06: 00f71563 bne a4,a5,f10
f0a: 18c526af sc.w a3,a2,(a0)
f0e: faf5 bnez a3,f02
f10: 40f707bb subw a5,a4,a5
f14: 0017b513 seqz a0,a5
f18: c391 beqz a5,f1c
f1a: c198 sw a4,0(a1)
f1c: 8905 andi a0,a0,1
f1e: 8082 ret
New:
e28: 4194 lw a3,0(a1)
e2a: 4701 li a4,0
e2c: 1005282f lr.w a6,(a0)
e30: 00d81963 bne a6,a3,e42
e34: 18c527af sc.w a5,a2,(a0)
e38: fbf5 bnez a5,e2c
e3a: 4705 li a4,1
e3c: 00177513 andi a0,a4,1
e40: 8082 ret
e42: 0105a023 sw a6,0(a1)
e46: 00177513 andi a0,a4,1
e4a: 8082 ret
gcc/
PR 100266
* config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (riscv_expand_compare_and_swap): New.
* config/riscv/riscv.c (riscv_emit_unlikely_jump): New.
* config/rsicv/riscv.c (riscv_expand_compare_and_swap): New.
* config/rsicv/sync.md (atomic_cas_value_strong): Removed.
* config/rsicv/sync.md (atomic_compare_and_swap): Call
riscv_expand_compare_and_swap.
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h | 1 +
gcc/config/riscv/riscv.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gcc/config/riscv/sync.md | 35 +----------------
3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
index 43d7224d6941..eb7e67d3b95a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ extern void riscv_expand_int_scc (rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx, rtx);
extern void riscv_expand_float_scc (rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx, rtx);
extern void riscv_expand_conditional_branch (rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx, rtx);
extern void riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx_code, rtx, rtx);
+extern void riscv_expand_compare_and_swap (rtx[]);
#endif
extern rtx riscv_legitimize_call_address (rtx);
extern void riscv_set_return_address (rtx, rtx);
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.c b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.c
index 6e97b38db6db..c81a9bd6a29e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.c
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.c
@@ -2488,6 +2488,74 @@ riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx dest, rtx cons, rtx alt, rtx_code code,
cons, alt)));
}
+/* Mark the previous jump instruction as unlikely. */
+
+static void
+riscv_emit_unlikely_jump (rtx insn)
+{
+ rtx_insn *jump = emit_jump_insn (insn);
+ add_reg_br_prob_note (jump, profile_probability::very_unlikely ());
+}
+
+/* Expand code to perform a compare-and-swap. */
+
+extern void riscv_expand_compare_and_swap (rtx operands[])
+{
+ rtx bval, oldval, mem, expval, newval, mod_s, mod_f, scratch, cond1, cond2;
+ machine_mode mode;
+ rtx_code_label *begin_label, *end_label;
+
+ bval = operands[0];
+ oldval = operands[1];
+ mem = operands[2];
+ expval = operands[3];
+ newval = operands[4];
+ mod_s = operands[6];
+ mod_f = operands[7];
+ mode = GET_MODE (mem);
+ scratch = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
+ begin_label = gen_label_rtx ();
+ end_label = gen_label_rtx ();
+
+ /* No support for sub-word CAS. */
+ if (mode == QImode || mode == HImode)
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+
+ /* We use mod_f for LR and mod_s for SC below, but
+ RV does not have any guarantees for LR.rl and SC.aq. */
+ if (is_mm_acquire (memmodel_base (INTVAL (mod_s)))
+ && is_mm_relaxed (memmodel_base (INTVAL (mod_f))))
+ {
+ mod_f = GEN_INT (MEMMODEL_ACQUIRE);
+ mod_s = GEN_INT (MEMMODEL_RELAXED);
+ }
+
+ /* Since we want to maintain a branch-free good-case, but also want
+ to not have two branches in the bad-case, we set bval to FALSE
+ on top of the sequence. In the bad case, we simply jump over
+ the assignment of bval to TRUE at the end of the sequence. */
+
+ emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (bval, gen_rtx_CONST_INT (SImode, FALSE)));
+
+ emit_label (begin_label);
+
+ emit_insn (gen_riscv_load_reserved (mode, oldval, mem, mod_f));
+
+ cond1 = gen_rtx_NE (mode, oldval, expval);
+ riscv_emit_unlikely_jump (gen_cbranch4 (Pmode, cond1, oldval, expval,
+ end_label));
+
+ emit_insn (gen_riscv_store_conditional (mode, scratch, mem, newval, mod_s));
+
+ cond2 = gen_rtx_NE (mode, scratch, const0_rtx);
+ riscv_emit_unlikely_jump (gen_cbranch4 (Pmode, cond2, scratch, const0_rtx,
+ begin_label));
+
+ emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (bval, gen_rtx_CONST_INT (SImode, TRUE)));
+
+ emit_label (end_label);
+}
+
/* Implement TARGET_FUNCTION_ARG_BOUNDARY. Every parameter gets at
least PARM_BOUNDARY bits of alignment, but will be given anything up
to PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY bits if the type requires it. */
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md b/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md
index 49b860da8ef0..da8dbf698163 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md
@@ -207,20 +207,6 @@
"amoswap.<amo>%A3 %0,%z2,%1"
)
-(define_insn "atomic_cas_value_strong<mode>"
- [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
- (match_operand:GPR 1 "memory_operand" "+A"))
- (set (match_dup 1)
- (unspec_volatile:GPR [(match_operand:GPR 2 "reg_or_0_operand" "rJ")
- (match_operand:GPR 3 "reg_or_0_operand" "rJ")
- (match_operand:SI 4 "const_int_operand") ;; mod_s
- (match_operand:SI 5 "const_int_operand")] ;; mod_f
- UNSPEC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP))
- (clobber (match_scratch:GPR 6 "=&r"))]
- "TARGET_ATOMIC"
- "1: lr.<amo>%A5 %0,%1; bne %0,%z2,1f; sc.<amo>%A4 %6,%z3,%1; bnez %6,1b; 1:"
- [(set (attr "length") (const_int 20))])
-
(define_expand "atomic_compare_and_swap<mode>"
[(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "") ;; bool output
(match_operand:GPR 1 "register_operand" "") ;; val output
@@ -232,26 +218,7 @@
(match_operand:SI 7 "const_int_operand" "")] ;; mod_f
"TARGET_ATOMIC"
{
- emit_insn (gen_atomic_cas_value_strong<mode> (operands[1], operands[2],
- operands[3], operands[4],
- operands[6], operands[7]));
-
- rtx compare = operands[1];
- if (operands[3] != const0_rtx)
- {
- rtx difference = gen_rtx_MINUS (<MODE>mode, operands[1], operands[3]);
- compare = gen_reg_rtx (<MODE>mode);
- emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (compare, difference));
- }
-
- if (word_mode != <MODE>mode)
- {
- rtx reg = gen_reg_rtx (word_mode);
- emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (reg, gen_rtx_SIGN_EXTEND (word_mode, compare)));
- compare = reg;
- }
-
- emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (operands[0], gen_rtx_EQ (SImode, compare, const0_rtx)));
+ riscv_expand_compare_and_swap (operands);
DONE;
})
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-26 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-26 12:45 [PATCH 00/10] [RISC-V] Atomics improvements [PR100265/PR100266] Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 01/10] RISC-V: Simplify memory model code [PR 100265] Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 02/10] RISC-V: Emit proper memory ordering suffixes for AMOs " Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 03/10] RISC-V: Eliminate %F specifier from riscv_print_operand() " Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 04/10] RISC-V: Don't use amoswap for atomic stores " Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 05/10] RISC-V: Emit fences according to chosen memory model " Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 06/10] RISC-V: Implement atomic_{load,store} " Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 07/10] RISC-V: Model INSNs for LR and SC [PR 100266] Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 08/10] RISC-V: Add s.ext-consuming " Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 09/10] RISC-V: Generate helpers for cbranch4 " Christoph Muellner
2021-04-26 14:39 ` Kito Cheng
2021-05-05 19:26 ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-26 12:45 ` Christoph Muellner [this message]
2021-04-27 15:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] RISC-V: Provide programmatic implementation of CAS " Jim Wilson
2021-04-28 22:40 ` [PATCH 00/10] [RISC-V] Atomics improvements [PR100265/PR100266] Jim Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210426124552.3316789-11-cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org \
--to=cmuellner@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jimw@sifive.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).