From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Eric Botcazou <botcazou@adacore.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] combine, v4: Fix AND handling for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets [PR109040]
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 06:35:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <811f7d5a-bb26-b9d1-ed09-7d404b9c7c7f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230413105755.GD19790@gate.crashing.org>
On 4/13/23 04:57, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:05:08PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 4/12/23 10:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> Seems my cross defaulted to 32-bit compilation, reproduced it with
>>> additional -mabi=lp64 -march=rv64gv even on the pr108947.c test.
>>> So, let's include that test in the patch too:
>>>
>>> 2023-04-12 Jeff Law <jlaw@ventanamicro.com>
>>> Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> PR target/108947
>>> PR target/109040
>>> * combine.cc (simplify_and_const_int_1): Compute nonzero_bits in
>>> word_mode rather than mode if WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS and mode is
>>> smaller than word_mode.
>>> * simplify-rtx.cc (simplify_context::simplify_binary_operation_1)
>>> <case AND>: Likewise.
>>>
>>> * gcc.dg/pr108947.c: New test.
>>> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr109040.c: New test.
>> Bootstrap of the v3 patch has completed. Regression testing is still
>> spinning. It should be done and waiting for me when I wake up in the
>> morning.
>
> It's still okay for trunk (of course) if the bootstrap doesn't fail (of
> course). Thanks guys!
Bootstrap was successful with v3, but there's hundreds of testsuite
failures due to the simplify-rtx hunk. compile/20070520-1.c for example
when compiled with: -O3 -funroll-loops -march=rv64gc -mabi=lp64d
Thursdays are my hell day. It's unlikely I'd be able to look at this at
all today.
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
extern uint8_t ff_cropTbl[256 + 2 * 1024];
void ff_pred8x8_plane_c(uint8_t *src, int stride){
int j, k;
int a;
uint8_t *cm = ff_cropTbl + 1024;
const uint8_t * const src0 = src+3-stride;
const uint8_t *src1 = src+4*stride-1;
const uint8_t *src2 = src1-2*stride;
int H = src0[1] - src0[-1];
int V = src1[0] - src2[ 0];
for(k=2; k<=4; ++k) {
src1 += stride; src2 -= stride;
H += k*(src0[k] - src0[-k]);
V += k*(src1[0] - src2[ 0]);
}
H = ( 17*H+16 ) >> 5;
V = ( 17*V+16 ) >> 5;
a = 16*(src1[0] + src2[8]+1) - 3*(V+H);
for(j=8; j>0; --j) {
int b = a;
a += V;
src[0] = cm[ (b ) >> 5 ];
src[1] = cm[ (b+ H) >> 5 ];
src[2] = cm[ (b+2*H) >> 5 ];
src[3] = cm[ (b+3*H) >> 5 ];
src[4] = cm[ (b+4*H) >> 5 ];
src[5] = cm[ (b+5*H) >> 5 ];
src[6] = cm[ (b+6*H) >> 5 ];
src[7] = cm[ (b+7*H) >> 5 ];
src += stride;
}
}
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-13 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 9:16 [PATCH] dse: Handle SUBREGs of word REGs differently " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-05 13:14 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-05 14:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-05 16:17 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-05 16:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-05 17:31 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 9:31 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-06 9:37 ` Li, Pan2
2023-04-06 14:49 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 14:45 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 10:15 ` Eric Botcazou
2023-04-06 10:31 ` [PATCH] combine: Fix simplify_comparison AND handling " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-06 10:51 ` Eric Botcazou
2023-04-06 11:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-06 14:21 ` Eric Botcazou
2023-04-09 0:25 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-10 7:10 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 1:26 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-12 6:21 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 10:02 ` [PATCH] combine, v3: Fix " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 14:17 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-12 14:30 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 15:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-12 16:58 ` [PATCH] combine, v4: " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-13 4:05 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-13 10:57 ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-13 12:35 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-04-13 13:45 ` [PATCH] loop-iv: Fix up bounds computation Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-13 15:07 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-13 19:37 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-12 13:29 ` [PATCH] combine: Fix simplify_comparison AND handling for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets [PR109040] Jeff Law
2023-04-09 1:15 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-10 5:13 ` Hongtao Liu
2023-04-10 5:15 ` Hongtao Liu
2023-04-06 14:35 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 15:06 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 14:53 ` [PATCH] dse: Handle SUBREGs of word REGs differently " Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=811f7d5a-bb26-b9d1-ed09-7d404b9c7c7f@gmail.com \
--to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=botcazou@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).