public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <botcazou@adacore.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] combine: Fix simplify_comparison AND handling for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets [PR109040]
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:29:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77648fcb-984d-6d1c-994a-597c7d8062ea@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZDZN5sukXDLkdZjW@tucnak>



On 4/12/23 00:21, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:26:07PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> I did bootstrap on riscv, but not a regression test, that's spinning right
>> now.
>>
>> Jeff
> 
>> diff --git a/gcc/combine.cc b/gcc/combine.cc
>> index 22bf8e1ec89..c41d8a09b3b 100644
>> --- a/gcc/combine.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/combine.cc
>> @@ -10055,9 +10055,10 @@ simplify_and_const_int_1 (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx varop,
>>   
>>     /* See what bits may be nonzero in VAROP.  Unlike the general case of
>>        a call to nonzero_bits, here we don't care about bits outside
>> -     MODE.  */
>> +     MODE unless WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS is true.  */
> 
> I would have expected something like
> WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS && known_le (GET_MODE_PRECISION (mode), BITS_PER_WORD)
> as the condition to use word_mode, rather than just
> WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS.  In both spots.  Because larger modes should be
> used as is, not a narrower word_mode instead of them.
Agreed.

Jeff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-05  9:16 [PATCH] dse: Handle SUBREGs of word REGs differently " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-05 13:14 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-05 14:51   ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-05 16:17     ` Jeff Law
2023-04-05 16:48       ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-05 17:31         ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06  9:31           ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-06  9:37             ` Li, Pan2
2023-04-06 14:49               ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 14:45             ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 10:15           ` Eric Botcazou
2023-04-06 10:31             ` [PATCH] combine: Fix simplify_comparison AND handling " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-06 10:51               ` Eric Botcazou
2023-04-06 11:37                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-06 14:21                   ` Eric Botcazou
2023-04-09  0:25                     ` Jeff Law
2023-04-10  7:10                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12  1:26                         ` Jeff Law
2023-04-12  6:21                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 10:02                             ` [PATCH] combine, v3: Fix " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 14:17                               ` Jeff Law
2023-04-12 14:30                                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 15:24                               ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-12 16:58                               ` [PATCH] combine, v4: " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-13  4:05                                 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-13 10:57                                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-13 12:35                                     ` Jeff Law
2023-04-13 13:45                                       ` [PATCH] loop-iv: Fix up bounds computation Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-13 15:07                                         ` Jeff Law
2023-04-13 19:37                                         ` Jeff Law
2023-04-12 13:29                             ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-04-09  1:15                   ` [PATCH] combine: Fix simplify_comparison AND handling for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets [PR109040] Jeff Law
2023-04-10  5:13                     ` Hongtao Liu
2023-04-10  5:15                       ` Hongtao Liu
2023-04-06 14:35               ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 15:06               ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 14:53             ` [PATCH] dse: Handle SUBREGs of word REGs differently " Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77648fcb-984d-6d1c-994a-597c7d8062ea@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=botcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).