From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
Eric Botcazou <botcazou@adacore.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] loop-iv: Fix up bounds computation
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:45:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDgHd4qtTuRk3r7H@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <811f7d5a-bb26-b9d1-ed09-7d404b9c7c7f@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 06:35:07AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> Bootstrap was successful with v3, but there's hundreds of testsuite failures
> due to the simplify-rtx hunk. compile/20070520-1.c for example when
> compiled with: -O3 -funroll-loops -march=rv64gc -mabi=lp64d
>
> Thursdays are my hell day. It's unlikely I'd be able to look at this at all
> today.
So, seems to me this is because loop-iv.cc asks for invalid RTL to be
simplified, it calls simplify_gen_binary (AND, SImode,
(subreg:SI (plus:DI (reg:DI 289 [ ivtmp_312 ])
(const_int 4294967295 [0xffffffff])) 0),
(const_int 4294967295 [0xffffffff]))
but 0xffffffff is not valid SImode CONST_INT, and unlike previously
we no longer on WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets which have DImode
word_mode optimize that into the op0, so the invalid constant is emitted
into the IL and checking fails.
The following patch fixes that (and we optimize that & -1 away even earlier
with that).
Could you please just quickly try to apply this patch, make in the stage3
directory followed by
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="... compile.exp='20070520-1.c ...'"
(with all tests that regressed previously), whether this is the only spot
or whether we need to fix some other place too?
2023-04-13 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* loop-iv.cc (iv_number_of_iterations): Use gen_int_mode instead
of GEN_INT.
--- gcc/loop-iv.cc.jj 2023-01-02 09:32:23.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/loop-iv.cc 2023-04-13 15:34:11.939045804 +0200
@@ -2617,7 +2617,7 @@ iv_number_of_iterations (class loop *loo
d *= 2;
size--;
}
- bound = GEN_INT (((uint64_t) 1 << (size - 1 ) << 1) - 1);
+ bound = gen_int_mode (((uint64_t) 1 << (size - 1) << 1) - 1, mode);
tmp1 = lowpart_subreg (mode, iv1.base, comp_mode);
tmp = simplify_gen_binary (UMOD, mode, tmp1, gen_int_mode (d, mode));
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-13 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 9:16 [PATCH] dse: Handle SUBREGs of word REGs differently for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets [PR109040] Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-05 13:14 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-05 14:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-05 16:17 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-05 16:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-05 17:31 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 9:31 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-06 9:37 ` Li, Pan2
2023-04-06 14:49 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 14:45 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 10:15 ` Eric Botcazou
2023-04-06 10:31 ` [PATCH] combine: Fix simplify_comparison AND handling " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-06 10:51 ` Eric Botcazou
2023-04-06 11:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-06 14:21 ` Eric Botcazou
2023-04-09 0:25 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-10 7:10 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 1:26 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-12 6:21 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 10:02 ` [PATCH] combine, v3: Fix " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 14:17 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-12 14:30 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-12 15:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-12 16:58 ` [PATCH] combine, v4: " Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-13 4:05 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-13 10:57 ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-13 12:35 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-13 13:45 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2023-04-13 15:07 ` [PATCH] loop-iv: Fix up bounds computation Jeff Law
2023-04-13 19:37 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-12 13:29 ` [PATCH] combine: Fix simplify_comparison AND handling for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets [PR109040] Jeff Law
2023-04-09 1:15 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-10 5:13 ` Hongtao Liu
2023-04-10 5:15 ` Hongtao Liu
2023-04-06 14:35 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 15:06 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-06 14:53 ` [PATCH] dse: Handle SUBREGs of word REGs differently " Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZDgHd4qtTuRk3r7H@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=botcazou@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).