public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Manolis Tsamis <manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>,
	Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cprop_hardreg: Enable propagation of the stack pointer if possible.
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 16:16:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9242b5d4-8957-b90b-7561-c97b5cf6abca@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM3yNXrSxLzuVPVyro=aN7GT0A22MO4C2FCC9g0tPdELdyM8Kg@mail.gmail.com>



On 5/31/23 06:15, Manolis Tsamis wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 4:38 PM Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/25/23 06:35, Manolis Tsamis wrote:
>>> Propagation of the stack pointer in cprop_hardreg is currenty forbidden
>>> in all cases, due to maybe_mode_change returning NULL. Relax this
>>> restriction and allow propagation when no mode change is requested.
>>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>>           * regcprop.cc (maybe_mode_change): Enable stack pointer propagation.
>> I can't see how this can be correct given the stack pointer equality
>> tests elsewhere in the compiler, particularly the various targets.
>>
>> The problem is if you change the mode then you end up with multiple REG
>> expressions that reference the stack pointer.
>>
>> See rev: d1446456c3fcaa7be628726c9de4a877729490ca and the thread around
>> the change which introduced this code.
>>
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Isn't this fine for this case since:
> 
>    1) stack_pointer_rtx is used which won't cause issues with pointer
> equalities (If I understand correctly).
>    2) Propagation is guarded with `if (orig_mode == new_mode)` so only
> when there is no mode change.
I must have missed #2 -- is that something that changed since the first 
iteration for Ventana many months ago?

Anyway, hoping to make meaningful progress on these two patches over the 
next couple days.

jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-07 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-25 12:35 [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: New pass to optimize calculation of offsets for memory operations Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] Implementation of new RISCV optimizations pass: fold-mem-offsets Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 13:01   ` Richard Biener
2023-05-25 13:25     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 13:31     ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 13:50       ` Richard Biener
2023-05-25 14:02         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-29 23:30           ` Jeff Law
2023-05-31 12:19             ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-31 14:00               ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 14:13         ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 14:18           ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-06-08  5:37   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12  7:36     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-12 14:37       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-09  0:57   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12  7:32     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-12 21:58       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-15 17:34         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-10 15:49   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12  7:41     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-12 21:36       ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] cprop_hardreg: Enable propagation of the stack pointer if possible Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 13:38   ` Jeff Law
2023-05-31 12:15     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-07 22:16       ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-06-07 22:18   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-08  6:15     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-15 20:13     ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-06-19 16:57       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-19 17:07         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-19 23:40         ` Andrew Pinski
2023-06-19 23:48           ` Andrew Pinski
2023-06-20  2:16             ` Jeff Law
2023-06-20  4:52               ` Tamar Christina
2023-06-20  5:00                 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-21 23:42                   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-22  7:37                     ` Richard Biener
2023-06-22  7:58                       ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-05-25 13:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: New pass to optimize calculation of offsets for memory operations Jeff Law
2023-05-25 13:57   ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-15 15:04   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-15 15:30     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-15 15:56       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-18 18:11       ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9242b5d4-8957-b90b-7561-c97b5cf6abca@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).