public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
Cc: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>,
	 Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,
	Manolis Tsamis <manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu>,
	 Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	 Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cprop_hardreg: Enable propagation of the stack pointer if possible.
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:37:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc2c2wdy+K2t-b-gvED2-abd5L0R0KNoVj1oH_gUA0viYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871qi4idr7.fsf@linaro.org>

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 1:42 AM Thiago Jung Bauermann
<thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On 6/19/23 22:52, Tamar Christina wrote:
> >
> >>> It's a bit hackish, but could we reject the stack pointer for operand1 in the
> >>> stack-tie?  And if we do so, does it help?
> >> Yeah this one I had to defer until later this week to look at closer because what I'm
> >> wondering about is whether the optimization should apply to frame related
> >> RTX as well.
> >> Looking at the description of RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P that this optimization may
> >> end up de-optimizing RISC targets by creating an offset that is larger than offset
> >> which can be used from a SP making reload having to spill.  i.e. sometimes the
> >> move was explicitly done. So perhaps it should not apply it to
> >> RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P in find_oldest_value_reg and copyprop_hardreg_forward_1?
> >> Other parts of this pass already seems to bail out in similar situations. So I needed
> >> to
> >> write some testcases to check what would happen in these cases hence the deferral.
> >> to later in the week.
> > Rejecting for RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P would seem reasonable and probably better in general to
> > me.  The cases where we're looking to clean things up aren't really in the
> > prologue/epilogue, but instead in the main body after register elimination has turned fp
> > into sp + offset, thus making all kinds of things no longer valid.
>
> The problems I reported were fixed by commits:
>
> 580b74a79146 "aarch64: Robustify stack tie handling"
> 079f31c55318 "aarch64: Fix gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pcs failures"
>
> Thanks!
>
> But unfortunately I'm still seeing bootstrap failures (ICE segmentation
> fault) in today's trunk with build config bootstrap-lto in both
> armv8l-linux-gnueabihf and aarch64-linux-gnu.

If there's not yet a bugreport for this please make sure to open one so
this issue doesn't get lost.

> If I revert commit 6a2e8dcbbd4b "cprop_hardreg: Enable propagation of
> the stack pointer if possible" from trunk then both bootstraps succeed.
>
> Here's the command I'm using to build on armv8l:
>
> ~/src/configure \
>     SHELL=/bin/bash \
>     --with-gnu-as \
>     --with-gnu-ld \
>     --disable-libmudflap \
>     --enable-lto \
>     --enable-shared \
>     --without-included-gettext \
>     --enable-nls \
>     --with-system-zlib \
>     --disable-sjlj-exceptions \
>     --enable-gnu-unique-object \
>     --enable-linker-build-id \
>     --disable-libstdcxx-pch \
>     --enable-c99 \
>     --enable-clocale=gnu \
>     --enable-libstdcxx-debug \
>     --enable-long-long \
>     --with-cloog=no \
>     --with-ppl=no \
>     --with-isl=no \
>     --disable-multilib \
>     --with-float=hard \
>     --with-fpu=neon-fp-armv8 \
>     --with-mode=thumb \
>     --with-arch=armv8-a \
>     --enable-threads=posix \
>     --enable-multiarch \
>     --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes \
>     --enable-gnu-indirect-function \
>     --disable-werror \
>     --enable-checking=yes \
>     --enable-bootstrap \
>     --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto \
>     --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto \
>     && make \
>         profiledbootstrap \
>         SHELL=/bin/bash \
>         -w \
>         -j 40 \
>         CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="-pipe -g -O2" \
>         CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="-pipe -g -O2" \
>         LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="-static-libgcc" \
>         MAKEINFOFLAGS=--force \
>         BUILD_INFO="" \
>         MAKEINFO=echo
>
> And here's the slightly different one for aarch64-linux:
>
> ~/src/configure \
>     SHELL=/bin/bash \
>     --with-gnu-as \
>     --with-gnu-ld \
>     --disable-libmudflap \
>     --enable-lto \
>     --enable-shared \
>     --without-included-gettext \
>     --enable-nls \
>     --with-system-zlib \
>     --disable-sjlj-exceptions \
>     --enable-gnu-unique-object \
>     --enable-linker-build-id \
>     --disable-libstdcxx-pch \
>     --enable-c99 \
>     --enable-clocale=gnu \
>     --enable-libstdcxx-debug \
>     --enable-long-long \
>     --with-cloog=no \
>     --with-ppl=no \
>     --with-isl=no \
>     --disable-multilib \
>     --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 \
>     --enable-fix-cortex-a53-843419 \
>     --with-arch=armv8-a \
>     --enable-threads=posix \
>     --enable-multiarch \
>     --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes \
>     --enable-gnu-indirect-function \
>     --disable-werror \
>     --enable-checking=yes \
>     --enable-bootstrap \
>     --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto \
>     --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto \
>     && make \
>         profiledbootstrap \
>         SHELL=/bin/bash \
>         -w \
>         -j 40 \
>         LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-Wl,-fix-cortex-a53-843419" \
>         CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="-pipe -g -O2" \
>         CXXFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="-pipe -g -O2" \
>         LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD="-static-libgcc" \
>         MAKEINFOFLAGS=--force \
>         BUILD_INFO="" \
>         MAKEINFO=echo
>
> --
> Thiago

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-25 12:35 [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: New pass to optimize calculation of offsets for memory operations Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] Implementation of new RISCV optimizations pass: fold-mem-offsets Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 13:01   ` Richard Biener
2023-05-25 13:25     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 13:31     ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 13:50       ` Richard Biener
2023-05-25 14:02         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-29 23:30           ` Jeff Law
2023-05-31 12:19             ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-31 14:00               ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 14:13         ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 14:18           ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-06-08  5:37   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12  7:36     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-12 14:37       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-09  0:57   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12  7:32     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-12 21:58       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-15 17:34         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-10 15:49   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12  7:41     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-12 21:36       ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] cprop_hardreg: Enable propagation of the stack pointer if possible Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 13:38   ` Jeff Law
2023-05-31 12:15     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-07 22:16       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-07 22:18   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-08  6:15     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-15 20:13     ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-06-19 16:57       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-19 17:07         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-19 23:40         ` Andrew Pinski
2023-06-19 23:48           ` Andrew Pinski
2023-06-20  2:16             ` Jeff Law
2023-06-20  4:52               ` Tamar Christina
2023-06-20  5:00                 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-21 23:42                   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-22  7:37                     ` Richard Biener [this message]
2023-06-22  7:58                       ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-05-25 13:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: New pass to optimize calculation of offsets for memory operations Jeff Law
2023-05-25 13:57   ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-15 15:04   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-15 15:30     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-15 15:56       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-18 18:11       ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFiYyc2c2wdy+K2t-b-gvED2-abd5L0R0KNoVj1oH_gUA0viYQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=Tamar.Christina@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
    --cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).