public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manolis Tsamis <manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu>
To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>,
	 Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cprop_hardreg: Enable propagation of the stack pointer if possible.
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:15:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM3yNXrSxLzuVPVyro=aN7GT0A22MO4C2FCC9g0tPdELdyM8Kg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46d35ebf-b73a-b60d-4e03-35327f1ce80e@gmail.com>

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 4:38 PM Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/25/23 06:35, Manolis Tsamis wrote:
> > Propagation of the stack pointer in cprop_hardreg is currenty forbidden
> > in all cases, due to maybe_mode_change returning NULL. Relax this
> > restriction and allow propagation when no mode change is requested.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >          * regcprop.cc (maybe_mode_change): Enable stack pointer propagation.
> I can't see how this can be correct given the stack pointer equality
> tests elsewhere in the compiler, particularly the various targets.
>
> The problem is if you change the mode then you end up with multiple REG
> expressions that reference the stack pointer.
>
> See rev: d1446456c3fcaa7be628726c9de4a877729490ca and the thread around
> the change which introduced this code.
>

Hi Jeff,

Isn't this fine for this case since:

  1) stack_pointer_rtx is used which won't cause issues with pointer
equalities (If I understand correctly).
  2) Propagation is guarded with `if (orig_mode == new_mode)` so only
when there is no mode change.

Thanks,
Manolis

>
> Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-31 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-25 12:35 [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: New pass to optimize calculation of offsets for memory operations Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] Implementation of new RISCV optimizations pass: fold-mem-offsets Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 13:01   ` Richard Biener
2023-05-25 13:25     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 13:31     ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 13:50       ` Richard Biener
2023-05-25 14:02         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-29 23:30           ` Jeff Law
2023-05-31 12:19             ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-31 14:00               ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 14:13         ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 14:18           ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-06-08  5:37   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12  7:36     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-12 14:37       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-09  0:57   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12  7:32     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-12 21:58       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-15 17:34         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-10 15:49   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12  7:41     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-12 21:36       ` Jeff Law
2023-05-25 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] cprop_hardreg: Enable propagation of the stack pointer if possible Manolis Tsamis
2023-05-25 13:38   ` Jeff Law
2023-05-31 12:15     ` Manolis Tsamis [this message]
2023-06-07 22:16       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-07 22:18   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-08  6:15     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-15 20:13     ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-06-19 16:57       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-19 17:07         ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-19 23:40         ` Andrew Pinski
2023-06-19 23:48           ` Andrew Pinski
2023-06-20  2:16             ` Jeff Law
2023-06-20  4:52               ` Tamar Christina
2023-06-20  5:00                 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-21 23:42                   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-22  7:37                     ` Richard Biener
2023-06-22  7:58                       ` Philipp Tomsich
2023-05-25 13:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: New pass to optimize calculation of offsets for memory operations Jeff Law
2023-05-25 13:57   ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-15 15:04   ` Jeff Law
2023-06-15 15:30     ` Manolis Tsamis
2023-06-15 15:56       ` Jeff Law
2023-06-18 18:11       ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAM3yNXrSxLzuVPVyro=aN7GT0A22MO4C2FCC9g0tPdELdyM8Kg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).