Re: other/5390: What about this PR?

Re: other/5390: What about this PR?

[DJ Delorie]

The following reply was made to PR c++/5390; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: carlo@alinoe.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
Subject: Re: other/5390: What about this PR?
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 13:16:07 -0400

 > I think it might as well be applied to the 3.3 branch,
 > but if not - then this PR can be closed: its status
 > still sits at 'feedback'.
 
 At this point, it's not up to me.  If the 3.3 branch folks want to
 apply the patch, it's OK with me.

Re: other/5390: What about this PR?

[Mark Mitchell]

The following reply was made to PR c++/5390; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>, carlo@alinoe.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: other/5390: What about this PR?
Date: 02 May 2003 11:18:25 -0700

 On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 11:13, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
 > On Fri, 2 May 2003, DJ Delorie wrote:
 > 
 > > 
 > > > I think it might as well be applied to the 3.3 branch,
 > > > but if not - then this PR can be closed: its status
 > > > still sits at 'feedback'.
 > > 
 > > At this point, it's not up to me.  If the 3.3 branch folks want to
 > > apply the patch, it's OK with me.
 > 
 > So this is Mark's call.
 > 
 > If it's not going into 3.3, please queue it for 3.3.1.
 
 Too late for 3.3, but OK for 3.3.1.
 
 Thanks,
 
 -- 
 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
 CodeSourcery, LLC
 

Re: other/5390: What about this PR?

[Wolfgang Bangerth]

The following reply was made to PR c++/5390; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: carlo@alinoe.com, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
   <mark@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: other/5390: What about this PR?
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 13:13:57 -0500 (CDT)

 On Fri, 2 May 2003, DJ Delorie wrote:
 
 > 
 > > I think it might as well be applied to the 3.3 branch,
 > > but if not - then this PR can be closed: its status
 > > still sits at 'feedback'.
 > 
 > At this point, it's not up to me.  If the 3.3 branch folks want to
 > apply the patch, it's OK with me.
 
 So this is Mark's call.
 
 If it's not going into 3.3, please queue it for 3.3.1.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
 
 

other/5390: What about this PR?

[Carlo Wood]

The following reply was made to PR c++/5390; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu, dj@redhat.com
Subject: other/5390: What about this PR?
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 14:53:05 +0200

 Just now I did a 'cvs diff' on the gcc-3.3 branch
 and found a modified file: cplus-dem.c
 
 This diff turned out to be related to PR other/5390
 
 It turns out that my patch (made for 3.3 at the time)
 was applied to 3.4 only.
 
 I think it might as well be applied to the 3.3 branch,
 but if not - then this PR can be closed: its status
 still sits at 'feedback'.
 
 -- 
 Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>