public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* struct vs. class in GCC source
@ 2023-01-10 14:50 Paul Koning
  2023-01-10 19:29 ` Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Koning @ 2023-01-10 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GCC Development

Building on Mac with Clang I get warnings like this:

../../../gcc/gcc/cgraph.h:2629:28: warning: struct 'cgraph_edge' was previously declared as a class; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]

It seems to be talking about a MS bug (since C++ says struct and class mean the same thing other than the default access).  Still, I wonder if it would be worth changing the code to use just one of "struct" or "class" for any given type.  (And then the convention would presumably be that a POD type is called "struct" and other types are "class".)

	paul


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-10 19:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-10 14:50 struct vs. class in GCC source Paul Koning
2023-01-10 19:29 ` Jason Merrill

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).