RE: GCC support addition for Safety compliances

RE: GCC support addition for Safety compliances

[Vishal B Patil]

Hi Team,

Any updates ?

Regards,
Vishal B Patil

vishal.b.patil@cummins.com

Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud
Pune
Maharashtra
411038
India

-----Original Message-----
From: Vishal B Patil 
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:18 PM
To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>
Subject: RE: GCC support addition for Safety compliances

Hi Team,

Thanks for the response.

Actually required for UL60730, UL6200. Please share the costs and time as well.

Regards,
Vishal B Patil

vishal.b.patil@cummins.com

Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud
Pune
Maharashtra
411038
India

-----Original Message-----
From: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:07 PM
To: Vishal B Patil <vishal.b.patil@cummins.com>
Subject: GCC support addition for Safety compliances

EXTERNAL SENDER: This email originated outside of Cummins. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe.


Hello

> Need support from the GCC GNU for the some safety compliances. Can you please guide or check which GCC support the safety compliances.
For safety compliance GCC is probably not enough.


Consider (if allowed by your authorities) using static analysis tools like https://frama-c.com/ or https://www.absint.com/products.htm


Be sure to understand what technically safety compliance means to you.
DOI178C? ISO26262?

Be also aware that safety compliance costs a lot of money and a lot of time. (you'll probably need a budget above 100k€ ou 100kUS$ and about a person*year of developer efforts)


--
Basile Starynkevitch                  <basile@starynkevitch.net>
(only mine opinions / les opinions sont miennes uniquement)
92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France
web page: starynkevitch.net/Basile/

Re: GCC support addition for Safety compliances

[Jonathan Wakely]

On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 10:25, Vishal B Patil via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> Any updates ?

You're not going to get any useful answers.

You asked "Please share the costs and time as well." Costs for what? From whom?

GCC is an open-source project with a diverse community of hundreds of
contributors. Who are you asking to give you costs? What work are you
expecting them to do?

It is unlikely that you obtained GCC from https://gcc.gnu.org so you
should probably talk to whoever provided you with your GCC binaries.
For safety compliance you will probably need to talk to a third-party
who specializes in that. I don't think you will achieve anything by
asking the GCC project to do that for you.

That's not how open source projects work.



>
> Regards,
> Vishal B Patil
>
> vishal.b.patil@cummins.com
>
> Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud
> Pune
> Maharashtra
> 411038
> India
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vishal B Patil
> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:18 PM
> To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>
> Subject: RE: GCC support addition for Safety compliances
>
> Hi Team,
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> Actually required for UL60730, UL6200. Please share the costs and time as well.
>
> Regards,
> Vishal B Patil
>
> vishal.b.patil@cummins.com
>
> Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud
> Pune
> Maharashtra
> 411038
> India
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:07 PM
> To: Vishal B Patil <vishal.b.patil@cummins.com>
> Subject: GCC support addition for Safety compliances
>
> EXTERNAL SENDER: This email originated outside of Cummins. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
> Hello
>
> > Need support from the GCC GNU for the some safety compliances. Can you please guide or check which GCC support the safety compliances.
> For safety compliance GCC is probably not enough.
>
>
> Consider (if allowed by your authorities) using static analysis tools like https://frama-c.com/ or https://www.absint.com/products.htm
>
>
> Be sure to understand what technically safety compliance means to you.
> DOI178C? ISO26262?
>
> Be also aware that safety compliance costs a lot of money and a lot of time. (you'll probably need a budget above 100k€ ou 100kUS$ and about a person*year of developer efforts)
>
>
> --
> Basile Starynkevitch                  <basile@starynkevitch.net>
> (only mine opinions / les opinions sont miennes uniquement)
> 92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France
> web page: starynkevitch.net/Basile/
>

Re: GCC support addition for Safety compliances

[David Brown]

On 12/07/2023 14:43, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 10:25, Vishal B Patil via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> Any updates ?
> 
> You're not going to get any useful answers.
> 
> You asked "Please share the costs and time as well." Costs for what? From whom?
> 
> GCC is an open-source project with a diverse community of hundreds of
> contributors. Who are you asking to give you costs? What work are you
> expecting them to do?
> 
> It is unlikely that you obtained GCC from https://gcc.gnu.org so you
> should probably talk to whoever provided you with your GCC binaries.

Most people get their GCC binaries for free, and no such source is going 
to be able to help for safety compliance or any other kind of 
certification.  Certification always costs time, effort and money.  But 
there are suppliers who provide toolchain binaries with commercial 
support contract, and which could help with certification.  I know Code 
Sourcery certainly used to be able to provide language compliance 
certification - I have no idea if they still can (it seems they are part 
of Siemens these days).  Maybe Red Hat (part of IBM) can do so too, and 
possibly others.  But perhaps that will give the OP a starting point.

David


> For safety compliance you will probably need to talk to a third-party
> who specializes in that. I don't think you will achieve anything by
> asking the GCC project to do that for you.
> 
> That's not how open source projects work.
> 
> 
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vishal B Patil
>>
>> vishal.b.patil@cummins.com
>>
>> Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud
>> Pune
>> Maharashtra
>> 411038
>> India
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vishal B Patil
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:18 PM
>> To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>
>> Subject: RE: GCC support addition for Safety compliances
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> Thanks for the response.
>>
>> Actually required for UL60730, UL6200. Please share the costs and time as well.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vishal B Patil
>>
>> vishal.b.patil@cummins.com
>>
>> Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud
>> Pune
>> Maharashtra
>> 411038
>> India
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:07 PM
>> To: Vishal B Patil <vishal.b.patil@cummins.com>
>> Subject: GCC support addition for Safety compliances
>>
>> EXTERNAL SENDER: This email originated outside of Cummins. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>> Hello
>>
>>> Need support from the GCC GNU for the some safety compliances. Can you please guide or check which GCC support the safety compliances.
>> For safety compliance GCC is probably not enough.
>>
>>
>> Consider (if allowed by your authorities) using static analysis tools like https://frama-c.com/ or https://www.absint.com/products.htm
>>
>>
>> Be sure to understand what technically safety compliance means to you.
>> DOI178C? ISO26262?
>>
>> Be also aware that safety compliance costs a lot of money and a lot of time. (you'll probably need a budget above 100k€ ou 100kUS$ and about a person*year of developer efforts)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Basile Starynkevitch                  <basile@starynkevitch.net>
>> (only mine opinions / les opinions sont miennes uniquement)
>> 92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France
>> web page: starynkevitch.net/Basile/
>>
> 

Re: GCC support addition for Safety compliances

[Jonathan Wakely]

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 09:45, Vishal B Patil <vishal.b.patil@cummins.com> wrote:
>
> Hi team,
>
> I'm using Mingw win32. My total code size is around 82MB. I'm getting error while compilation "out of memory allocating 48 bytes" , I have attached the snap for your reference.
>
> I have cleaned temp folder but not solved, then I research and it's about the win32 mingw. Which has limit of 2GB. My code use more than 2GB size in memory, task manager it consumes 98% memory and then it crashed.
>
> Could you please help me on that.

This mailing list is for discussion the development of GCC itself, not
for asking for help using GCC. Please use the gcc-help list next time.

Your problem is not a problem with GCC, it's a problem with your
program. Either change your code to use less memory, or create a
64-bit executable that does not have the 2GB limit.

GCC support addition for Safety compliances

[Vishal B Patil]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 306 bytes --]

Hi Team,

Need support from the GCC GNU for the some safety compliances. Can you please guide or check which GCC support the safety compliances.

Regards,
Vishal B Patil

vishal.b.patil@cummins.com<mailto:vishal.b.patil@cummins.com>

Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud
Pune
Maharashtra
411038
India