* RE: GCC support addition for Safety compliances [not found] ` <CY4PR0501MB37799E8520102E8B4DBA47EBDC2FA@CY4PR0501MB3779.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> @ 2023-07-12 9:24 ` Vishal B Patil 2023-07-12 12:43 ` Jonathan Wakely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Vishal B Patil @ 2023-07-12 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Basile Starynkevitch, gcc Hi Team, Any updates ? Regards, Vishal B Patil vishal.b.patil@cummins.com Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud Pune Maharashtra 411038 India -----Original Message----- From: Vishal B Patil Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:18 PM To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> Subject: RE: GCC support addition for Safety compliances Hi Team, Thanks for the response. Actually required for UL60730, UL6200. Please share the costs and time as well. Regards, Vishal B Patil vishal.b.patil@cummins.com Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud Pune Maharashtra 411038 India -----Original Message----- From: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:07 PM To: Vishal B Patil <vishal.b.patil@cummins.com> Subject: GCC support addition for Safety compliances EXTERNAL SENDER: This email originated outside of Cummins. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe. Hello > Need support from the GCC GNU for the some safety compliances. Can you please guide or check which GCC support the safety compliances. For safety compliance GCC is probably not enough. Consider (if allowed by your authorities) using static analysis tools like https://frama-c.com/ or https://www.absint.com/products.htm Be sure to understand what technically safety compliance means to you. DOI178C? ISO26262? Be also aware that safety compliance costs a lot of money and a lot of time. (you'll probably need a budget above 100k€ ou 100kUS$ and about a person*year of developer efforts) -- Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> (only mine opinions / les opinions sont miennes uniquement) 92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France web page: starynkevitch.net/Basile/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC support addition for Safety compliances 2023-07-12 9:24 ` GCC support addition for Safety compliances Vishal B Patil @ 2023-07-12 12:43 ` Jonathan Wakely 2023-07-12 15:23 ` David Brown [not found] ` <CY4PR0501MB37791C2AF5B8884F39B27C71DCA7A@CY4PR0501MB3779.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2023-07-12 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vishal B Patil; +Cc: Basile Starynkevitch, gcc On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 10:25, Vishal B Patil via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > Hi Team, > > Any updates ? You're not going to get any useful answers. You asked "Please share the costs and time as well." Costs for what? From whom? GCC is an open-source project with a diverse community of hundreds of contributors. Who are you asking to give you costs? What work are you expecting them to do? It is unlikely that you obtained GCC from https://gcc.gnu.org so you should probably talk to whoever provided you with your GCC binaries. For safety compliance you will probably need to talk to a third-party who specializes in that. I don't think you will achieve anything by asking the GCC project to do that for you. That's not how open source projects work. > > Regards, > Vishal B Patil > > vishal.b.patil@cummins.com > > Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud > Pune > Maharashtra > 411038 > India > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vishal B Patil > Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:18 PM > To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> > Subject: RE: GCC support addition for Safety compliances > > Hi Team, > > Thanks for the response. > > Actually required for UL60730, UL6200. Please share the costs and time as well. > > Regards, > Vishal B Patil > > vishal.b.patil@cummins.com > > Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud > Pune > Maharashtra > 411038 > India > > -----Original Message----- > From: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> > Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:07 PM > To: Vishal B Patil <vishal.b.patil@cummins.com> > Subject: GCC support addition for Safety compliances > > EXTERNAL SENDER: This email originated outside of Cummins. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Hello > > > Need support from the GCC GNU for the some safety compliances. Can you please guide or check which GCC support the safety compliances. > For safety compliance GCC is probably not enough. > > > Consider (if allowed by your authorities) using static analysis tools like https://frama-c.com/ or https://www.absint.com/products.htm > > > Be sure to understand what technically safety compliance means to you. > DOI178C? ISO26262? > > Be also aware that safety compliance costs a lot of money and a lot of time. (you'll probably need a budget above 100k€ ou 100kUS$ and about a person*year of developer efforts) > > > -- > Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> > (only mine opinions / les opinions sont miennes uniquement) > 92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France > web page: starynkevitch.net/Basile/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: GCC support addition for Safety compliances 2023-07-12 12:43 ` Jonathan Wakely @ 2023-07-12 15:23 ` David Brown [not found] ` <CY4PR0501MB37791C2AF5B8884F39B27C71DCA7A@CY4PR0501MB3779.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: David Brown @ 2023-07-12 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vishal B Patil; +Cc: Basile Starynkevitch, Jonathan Wakely, gcc On 12/07/2023 14:43, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 10:25, Vishal B Patil via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Team, >> >> Any updates ? > > You're not going to get any useful answers. > > You asked "Please share the costs and time as well." Costs for what? From whom? > > GCC is an open-source project with a diverse community of hundreds of > contributors. Who are you asking to give you costs? What work are you > expecting them to do? > > It is unlikely that you obtained GCC from https://gcc.gnu.org so you > should probably talk to whoever provided you with your GCC binaries. Most people get their GCC binaries for free, and no such source is going to be able to help for safety compliance or any other kind of certification. Certification always costs time, effort and money. But there are suppliers who provide toolchain binaries with commercial support contract, and which could help with certification. I know Code Sourcery certainly used to be able to provide language compliance certification - I have no idea if they still can (it seems they are part of Siemens these days). Maybe Red Hat (part of IBM) can do so too, and possibly others. But perhaps that will give the OP a starting point. David > For safety compliance you will probably need to talk to a third-party > who specializes in that. I don't think you will achieve anything by > asking the GCC project to do that for you. > > That's not how open source projects work. > > > >> >> Regards, >> Vishal B Patil >> >> vishal.b.patil@cummins.com >> >> Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud >> Pune >> Maharashtra >> 411038 >> India >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vishal B Patil >> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:18 PM >> To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> >> Subject: RE: GCC support addition for Safety compliances >> >> Hi Team, >> >> Thanks for the response. >> >> Actually required for UL60730, UL6200. Please share the costs and time as well. >> >> Regards, >> Vishal B Patil >> >> vishal.b.patil@cummins.com >> >> Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud >> Pune >> Maharashtra >> 411038 >> India >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 4:07 PM >> To: Vishal B Patil <vishal.b.patil@cummins.com> >> Subject: GCC support addition for Safety compliances >> >> EXTERNAL SENDER: This email originated outside of Cummins. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> >> Hello >> >>> Need support from the GCC GNU for the some safety compliances. Can you please guide or check which GCC support the safety compliances. >> For safety compliance GCC is probably not enough. >> >> >> Consider (if allowed by your authorities) using static analysis tools like https://frama-c.com/ or https://www.absint.com/products.htm >> >> >> Be sure to understand what technically safety compliance means to you. >> DOI178C? ISO26262? >> >> Be also aware that safety compliance costs a lot of money and a lot of time. (you'll probably need a budget above 100k€ ou 100kUS$ and about a person*year of developer efforts) >> >> >> -- >> Basile Starynkevitch <basile@starynkevitch.net> >> (only mine opinions / les opinions sont miennes uniquement) >> 92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France >> web page: starynkevitch.net/Basile/ >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CY4PR0501MB37791C2AF5B8884F39B27C71DCA7A@CY4PR0501MB3779.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>]
* Re: GCC support addition for Safety compliances [not found] ` <CY4PR0501MB37791C2AF5B8884F39B27C71DCA7A@CY4PR0501MB3779.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> @ 2023-11-01 12:59 ` Jonathan Wakely 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2023-11-01 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vishal B Patil; +Cc: Basile Starynkevitch, gcc On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 09:45, Vishal B Patil <vishal.b.patil@cummins.com> wrote: > > Hi team, > > I'm using Mingw win32. My total code size is around 82MB. I'm getting error while compilation "out of memory allocating 48 bytes" , I have attached the snap for your reference. > > I have cleaned temp folder but not solved, then I research and it's about the win32 mingw. Which has limit of 2GB. My code use more than 2GB size in memory, task manager it consumes 98% memory and then it crashed. > > Could you please help me on that. This mailing list is for discussion the development of GCC itself, not for asking for help using GCC. Please use the gcc-help list next time. Your problem is not a problem with GCC, it's a problem with your program. Either change your code to use less memory, or create a 64-bit executable that does not have the 2GB limit. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* GCC support addition for Safety compliances @ 2023-07-05 9:23 Vishal B Patil 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Vishal B Patil @ 2023-07-05 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 306 bytes --] Hi Team, Need support from the GCC GNU for the some safety compliances. Can you please guide or check which GCC support the safety compliances. Regards, Vishal B Patil vishal.b.patil@cummins.com<mailto:vishal.b.patil@cummins.com> Dahanukar Colony, Kothrud Pune Maharashtra 411038 India ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-01 12:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <89859db1-8f61-dec7-491f-23c9ad31ec66@starynkevitch.net>
[not found] ` <CY4PR0501MB37799E8520102E8B4DBA47EBDC2FA@CY4PR0501MB3779.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
2023-07-12 9:24 ` GCC support addition for Safety compliances Vishal B Patil
2023-07-12 12:43 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-07-12 15:23 ` David Brown
[not found] ` <CY4PR0501MB37791C2AF5B8884F39B27C71DCA7A@CY4PR0501MB3779.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
2023-11-01 12:59 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-07-05 9:23 Vishal B Patil
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).