From: Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: s390 port
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 12:27:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMi4NxbHWJyE4Qa1F9PxJxc+_SgHpVRrbTBJBkn6AF2VRZFd2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFD715CBA8.348BA26E-ONC1258745.0041E541-C1258745.00430622@ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1931 bytes --]
On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 20:12, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
wrote:
> "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> wrote on 03.09.2021 13:35:10:
> > > Specifically, if you try to run AMODE64 with Pmode equals
> > > SImode, the compiler will not be aware that the hardware
> > > uses the high 32 bits of base and index registers, and
> > > will not necessarily keep them zero.
> > The compiler naturally keeps them zero. The
> > instructions that are used to load registers
> > do not pollute the high-order 32 bits.
>
> While this is true for most instructions, the compiler will not
> restrict itself to using only those. (As just one obvious
> example, the compiler may use "lay" with a negative displacement,
> which will set the high bits of a GPR in AMODE64.)
>
> (And, b.t.w. not the -m31 DImode, which is a pair of 32-bit
> GPRs, but rather the -m64 DImode, which is a single 64-bit GPR.)
>
Hi all.
Turns out I have been asking the wrong question for several years.
I was going to generate a peephole (an idea from the author of
UDOS, now KinnowOS) to detect when a negative index was
being used, and force an addition instead of an index, when I
realized that it wasn't just literals that could use a negative
value.
That is when I realized that negative numbers were perfectly
valid/normal for indexing, and that it is the OS/hardware that
needs to adapt to this reality when transitioning from 32-bit
hardware to 64-bit hardware.
As such, I have updated z/PDOS-32 to use DAT to map the
4 GiB to 8 GiB region to 0 to 4 GiB, so that negative indexing
works fine.
You can download this from http://pdos.org (down the bottom).
So would it be possible now to update gcc to make -m32 and
-m31 and -m24 all work, as they all generate the exact same
code, regrardless of whether you are running as AM24 on
S/370, AM31 on S/390 or AM32 on Hercules/380 or AM64
with DAT set appropriately on z/Arch.
Thanks. Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-20 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-05 12:45 i370 port Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 14:33 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-05 14:57 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 15:03 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-05 15:24 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 15:47 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-09-11 17:35 ` i370 port - in search of hooks Paul Edwards
2017-03-31 10:34 ` i370 port Paul Edwards
2009-09-12 12:41 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 15:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-05 15:39 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 15:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-05 15:57 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 20:20 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-05 20:45 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-06 15:00 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-15 17:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-19 0:06 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-19 12:28 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-18 11:28 ` Paul Edwards
2009-07-20 14:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-08 12:04 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-10 21:25 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-11 0:34 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-11 15:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-12 11:52 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-12 15:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-12 16:35 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-12 17:27 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-12 17:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-12 19:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-12 20:31 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-19 12:07 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-19 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-20 12:49 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-20 22:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-21 2:37 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-21 16:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-05 15:44 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-05 15:52 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-08 15:55 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-14 15:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2021-09-02 8:15 ` s390 port Paul Edwards
2021-09-02 14:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2021-09-02 14:50 ` Paul Edwards
2021-09-02 14:53 ` Ulrich Weigand
2021-09-02 15:01 ` Paul Edwards
2021-09-02 15:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2021-09-02 15:26 ` Paul Edwards
2021-09-02 19:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2021-09-02 20:05 ` Paul Edwards
2021-09-02 20:16 ` Andreas Schwab
2021-09-03 11:18 ` Ulrich Weigand
2021-09-03 11:35 ` Paul Edwards
2021-09-03 12:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2021-09-03 12:38 ` Paul Edwards
2021-09-03 12:53 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-09-03 13:12 ` Paul Edwards
2022-12-20 4:27 ` Paul Edwards [this message]
2021-09-02 10:56 Paul Edwards
2021-09-06 22:44 Build gcc question Gary Oblock
2021-09-07 7:21 ` s390 port Joe Monk
2021-09-08 3:46 ` Paul Edwards
2021-09-30 0:08 Paul Edwards
2021-09-30 0:59 ` Joe Monk
2021-09-30 21:39 Paul Edwards
2023-01-28 18:51 Paul Edwards
2023-01-29 13:08 ` Joe Monk
2023-01-29 14:30 ` Paul Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMi4NxbHWJyE4Qa1F9PxJxc+_SgHpVRrbTBJBkn6AF2VRZFd2Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mutazilah@gmail.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).