From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Natalia Saiapova via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] gdb/infrun: in condition evaluation wait only for the current inferior.
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:44:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201018184429.06921e24@f32-m1.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201009112719.629-5-natalia.saiapova@intel.com>
Hi Natalia,
I have a question about this commit. See below.
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 13:27:16 +0200
Natalia Saiapova via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> wrote:
> In the middle of a condition evaluation, to successfully finish the
> inferior call we need to wait for events from the current thread.
> Otherwise, a pending event from another thread might be taken and
> the inferior call is abandoned.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 2020-08-26 Natalia Saiapova <natalia.saiapova@intel.com>
> Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
>
> * infrun.c (do_target_wait): Match an inferior PID with the
> expected PID.
> (fetch_inferior_event): In condition evaluation, wait for the
> event from the current inferior.
>
> Co-authored-by: Natalia Saiapova <natalia.saiapova@intel.com>
> Co-authored-by: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Natalia Saiapova <natalia.saiapova@intel.com>
> ---
> gdb/infrun.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
> index 91271c2ddbe..d260eb6e3a7 100644
> --- a/gdb/infrun.c
> +++ b/gdb/infrun.c
> @@ -3565,10 +3565,11 @@ do_target_wait (ptid_t wait_ptid, execution_control_state *ecs,
> polling the rest of the inferior list starting from that one in a
> circular fashion until the whole list is polled once. */
>
> - auto inferior_matches = [&wait_ptid] (inferior *inf)
> + ptid_t wait_pid_ptid {wait_ptid.pid ()};
> + auto inferior_matches = [&wait_pid_ptid] (inferior *inf)
> {
> - return (inf->process_target () != NULL
> - && ptid_t (inf->pid).matches (wait_ptid));
> + return (inf->process_target () != nullptr
> + && ptid_t (inf->pid).matches (wait_pid_ptid));
> };
I'm puzzled by the changes above. Can you explain what this is
about? (And perhaps add a comment...)
>
> /* First see how many matching inferiors we have. */
> @@ -3906,7 +3907,15 @@ fetch_inferior_event ()
> = make_scoped_restore (&execution_direction,
> target_execution_direction ());
>
> - if (!do_target_wait (minus_one_ptid, ecs, TARGET_WNOHANG))
> + ptid_t waiton_ptid = minus_one_ptid;
> +
> + /* If the thread is in the middle of the condition evaluation,
> + wait for the event from the current inferior. */
> + if (inferior_ptid != null_ptid
> + && inferior_thread ()->control.in_cond_eval)
> + waiton_ptid = inferior_ptid;
> +
> + if (!do_target_wait (waiton_ptid, ecs, TARGET_WNOHANG))
> return;
>
> gdb_assert (ecs->ws.kind != TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> Intel Deutschland GmbH
> Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
> Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
> Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Gary Kershaw
> Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
> Registered Office: Munich
> Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-19 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200831123519.16232-1-natalia.saiapova () intel ! com>
2020-10-09 11:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Fix inferior calls from breakpoint condition Natalia Saiapova
2020-10-09 11:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] gdb: add in_cond_eval field to thread_control_state struct Natalia Saiapova
2021-03-02 10:43 ` Andrew Burgess
2020-10-09 11:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] gdb/infrun: in condition evaluation resume only current thread Natalia Saiapova
2021-03-02 11:15 ` Andrew Burgess
2020-10-09 11:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] gdb/infcall: in condition evaluation register target back after infcall Natalia Saiapova
2020-10-19 0:53 ` Kevin Buettner
2021-03-02 11:26 ` Andrew Burgess
2020-10-09 11:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] gdb/infrun: in condition evaluation wait only for the current inferior Natalia Saiapova
2020-10-19 1:44 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2020-10-26 12:11 ` Saiapova, Natalia
2021-03-02 12:17 ` Andrew Burgess
2020-10-09 11:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] gdb/infrun: in condition evaluation do not stop all threads Natalia Saiapova
2020-10-09 11:27 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] gdb/testsuite: add tests for inferior calls in breakpoint conditions Natalia Saiapova
2020-10-12 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Fix inferior calls from breakpoint condition Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201018184429.06921e24@f32-m1.lan \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).