Re: [PATCH 2/2] gdb/doc: uniformize wording for GMP and MPFR entries

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, apinski@marvell.com
> From: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 12:45:04 -0400
> 
> Hi Eli,
> 
> Le 2023-03-10 à 14:17, Eli Zaretskii a écrit :
> >> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:46:57 -0500
> >> Cc: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
> >> From: Philippe Blain via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> >>
> >> Make the wording of the GMP and MPFR entries in the "Requirements for
> >> Building GDB" section of the documentation more uniform by:
> >>
> >> - mentioning the configure script in the GMP entry, as is done in the
> >>   MPFR entry
> >> - adding the long name of the MPFR library between parenthesis, as is
> >>   done in the GMP entry
> >> - removing the second paragraph of the MPFR entry and moving its content
> >>   to the first one, mimicking the wording of the GMP entry
> >> ---
> >>  gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 13 ++++++-------
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > I don't mind the changes, but I also don't mind leaving the original
> > text intact: there's nothing wrong with it per se.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the reviwew. I do not have push access, would you be so
> kind as to push both patches ? 

My preference is to install only the first of these, for the reasons I
explained, but I'm waiting to hear opinions of others, if they differ.