From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not record a rejected target description
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:48:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bklwmenh.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230112193356.1133696-1-tromey@adacore.com>
Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
> When connecting to a certain target, gdb issues a warning about the
> target description:
>
> (gdb) target remote localhost:7947
> Remote debugging using localhost:7947
> warning: Architecture rejected target-supplied description
>
> If you then kill the inferior and change the exec-file, this will
> happen:
>
> (gdb) file bar
> Architecture of file not recognized.
>
> After this, debugging doesn't work very well.
>
> What happens here is that, despite the warning,
> target_find_description records the downloaded description in the
> target_desc_info. Then the "file" command ends up calling
> set_gdbarch_from_file, which uses that description.
>
> It seems to me that, because the architecture rejected the
> description, it should not be used. That is what this patch
> implements.
> ---
> gdb/target-descriptions.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/target-descriptions.c b/gdb/target-descriptions.c
> index 1a451c79b82..38d0b3f8c7d 100644
> --- a/gdb/target-descriptions.c
> +++ b/gdb/target-descriptions.c
> @@ -565,7 +565,10 @@ target_find_description (void)
>
> info.target_desc = tdesc_info->tdesc;
> if (!gdbarch_update_p (info))
> - warning (_("Architecture rejected target-supplied description"));
> + {
> + warning (_("Architecture rejected target-supplied description"));
> + tdesc_info->tdesc = nullptr;
> + }
This seems fine, but it is possible that an exception could take us out
of this function too, for example, a misbehaving remote target can cause
target_read_description_xml to throw an exception. I guess that any of
the issues you were originally seeing would also trigger if we throw an
exception.
I wonder if a better solution would be to use a RAII object to ensure
that tdesc_info->tdesc is always reset to nullptr on scope exit, then at
the end of target_find_description, after this line:
tdesc_info->fetched = true;
we would call a method on the RAII object to indicate that it should NOT
clear the tdesc field.
Thanks,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 19:33 Tom Tromey
2023-02-14 15:16 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-14 15:48 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2023-02-14 17:27 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-15 12:56 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-15 15:59 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-15 21:19 ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-15 21:38 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-16 19:20 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-16 19:33 ` Simon Marchi
2023-02-17 10:19 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-17 14:09 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-17 22:29 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bklwmenh.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).