From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 23:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ork7buc0yx.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>; from aoliva@redhat.com on Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:58:30PM -0300
On Jun 9, 2003, Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I agree. It's sort of odd to have important gcc issues like this talked
> > about somewhere outside of the gcc.gnu.org domain.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:58:30PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I've always wanted us to have toplevel@ or
> configure@sources.redhat.com, for all projects hosted in s.r.c., and
> GCC too, just because GCC shares most of the top-level files with
> that. Can't we go ahead and create one of these lists, in which we'll
> discuss not only this transition, but also any patches that affect the
> top level alone?
So first Christopher objects to a list having @codesourcery.com at the
end, and now Alexandre wants @redhat.com at the end? Thanks to both
companies for giving us so much free software work, but let's avoid any
company conflicts by avoiding use of either company's domain as much as we
can, OK? To do otherwise will just confuse people into thinking that
something is a single-company effort, when it is not.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-09 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-09 20:32 Zack Weinberg
2003-06-09 21:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-09 21:09 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-09 22:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-09 23:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-09 23:38 ` Joe Buck [this message]
2003-06-09 23:48 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-10 0:33 ` Joe Buck
2003-06-10 4:40 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-06-10 6:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-06-10 9:25 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-06-10 14:24 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 15:57 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-06-10 16:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-12 4:16 ` Red Hat logos on FSF web pages (was Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x) Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 17:40 ` Updating to Autoconf 2.5x Andrew Cagney
2003-06-10 13:48 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-06-10 14:23 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 14:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-10 15:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-10 16:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-06-10 17:47 ` Joe Buck
2003-06-09 23:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-10 0:50 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-10 0:55 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-10 2:58 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 3:43 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-06-10 2:37 ` Christopher Faylor, Christopher Faylor
2003-06-09 21:15 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-09 23:01 ` Zack Weinberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030609163836.A20345@synopsys.com \
--to=jbuck@synopsys.com \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=cgf@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).