From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030610164031.GA19400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1055260613.9414.38.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 08:56:51AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>That's all well and good, but the basic point certainly remains: we've
>worked very hard to make GCC appear to come entirely from a machine
>named gcc.gnu.org, and similar work has not been done for GDB, binutils,
>glibc, etc. Red Hat domain names and logos appear frequently on those
>web pages.
If anyone has specific examples, I'll see about getting this changed. I
didn't see anything at a quick glance. I know that the cvs instructions
(obviously?) specify sources.redhat.com but I don't know why there
should be Red Hat logos on FSF projects. That's just wrong. FWIW, I
removed some of the more flashy logos from some of the
sources.redhat.com web pages a while ago.
cgf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-10 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-09 20:32 Zack Weinberg
2003-06-09 21:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-09 21:09 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-09 22:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-09 23:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-09 23:38 ` Joe Buck
2003-06-09 23:48 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-10 0:33 ` Joe Buck
2003-06-10 4:40 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-06-10 6:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-06-10 9:25 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-06-10 14:24 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 15:57 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-06-10 16:40 ` Christopher Faylor [this message]
2003-06-12 4:16 ` Red Hat logos on FSF web pages (was Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x) Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 17:40 ` Updating to Autoconf 2.5x Andrew Cagney
2003-06-10 13:48 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-06-10 14:23 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 14:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-10 15:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-10 16:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-06-10 17:47 ` Joe Buck
2003-06-09 23:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-10 0:50 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-10 0:55 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-10 2:58 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 3:43 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-06-10 2:37 ` Christopher Faylor, Christopher Faylor
2003-06-09 21:15 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-09 23:01 ` Zack Weinberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030610164031.GA19400@redhat.com \
--to=cgf@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).