From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 23:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fzmiua86.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EE4F6AD.7060300@redhat.com> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Mon, 09 Jun 2003 17:05:49 -0400")
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
>> As you all know, the configure scripts for GCC, GDB, and binutils must
>> be generated with autoconf 2.13.
>
> GDB and BINUTILS use autoconf 000227 and not 2.13.
I didn't know that; thanks for the clarification.
>> At the recent GCC summit it was agreed that we
>
> I guess the royal ``we'' here is GCC?
Quite a few binutils and GDB maintainers were present at the
discussion I am referring to, and they agreed as well.
> Fortunatly GDB (binutils?) also see a need to get off the current
> autoconf and as such, I personally welcome this move.
Glad to have you on board.
> How does nathaniel and dj's work fit into this - its kind of a logical
> next step.
Good question.
> I think it would be better if this list was hosted, and made part of
> gcc.gnu.org.
Feel free to set up a list on gcc.gnu.org; I do not have the access to
do that. I felt that as a short-lived list, the precise hosting
location did not much matter.
zw
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-09 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-09 20:32 Zack Weinberg
2003-06-09 21:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-09 21:09 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-09 22:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-09 23:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-09 23:38 ` Joe Buck
2003-06-09 23:48 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-10 0:33 ` Joe Buck
2003-06-10 4:40 ` Zack Weinberg
2003-06-10 6:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-06-10 9:25 ` Joseph S. Myers
2003-06-10 14:24 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 15:57 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-06-10 16:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-12 4:16 ` Red Hat logos on FSF web pages (was Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x) Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 17:40 ` Updating to Autoconf 2.5x Andrew Cagney
2003-06-10 13:48 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2003-06-10 14:23 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 14:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-10 15:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-10 16:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2003-06-10 17:47 ` Joe Buck
2003-06-09 23:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-10 0:50 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-10 0:55 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-10 2:58 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-06-10 3:43 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-06-10 2:37 ` Christopher Faylor, Christopher Faylor
2003-06-09 21:15 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-09 23:01 ` Zack Weinberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fzmiua86.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com \
--to=zack@codesourcery.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).