Re: Updating to Autoconf 2.5x

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:38:36PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> 
> On Jun  9, 2003, Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > I agree.  It's sort of odd to have important gcc issues like this talked
> > > about somewhere outside of the gcc.gnu.org domain.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 07:58:30PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > I've always wanted us to have toplevel@ or
> > configure@sources.redhat.com, for all projects hosted in s.r.c., and
> > GCC too, just because GCC shares most of the top-level files with
> > that.  Can't we go ahead and create one of these lists, in which we'll
> > discuss not only this transition, but also any patches that affect the
> > top level alone?
> 
> So first Christopher objects to a list having @codesourcery.com at the
> end, and now Alexandre wants @redhat.com at the end?  Thanks to both
> companies for giving us so much free software work, but let's avoid any
> company conflicts by avoiding use of either company's domain as much as we
> can, OK?  To do otherwise will just confuse people into thinking that
> something is a single-company effort, when it is not.

Joe, please bear in mind that all the non-GCC projects affected by this
- there are quite a lot of them - are already hosted at
sources.redhat.com and have their mailing lists there.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer