Re: Proposal: Add review tags to patch review workflow.

[John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>]

On 9/26/22 6:55 AM, Simon Marchi via Gdb wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022-09-21 07:04, Bruno Larsen via Gdb wrote:
>> TL;DR: I want to introduce the usage of 3 new review tags to the GDB patch review workflow. They are: Reviewed-by, Approved-by and Tested-by.
> 
> Hi Bruno,
> 
> I completely agree with the proposal.  I really like the fact that it
> makes communication less ambiguous.  Following some process (or changing
> the process) can feel a bit heavy for long-timers, but I think it makes
> things much clearer for newcomers.
> 
> Assuming we will go through with this proposal, it will need to be
> documented on the wiki so we can easily refer people to the procedure.
> Probably the ContributionChecklist page?
> 
>    https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ContributionChecklist
> 
> Will you be able to take care of this when needed (do you have write
> access to the wiki)?
> 
> In the mean time, message to others: please let us know if you agree
> with this, it's difficult to know we have the support of the community
> if everybody silently agrees!

I'm fine with the idea.  I'm less worried about "credit" for reviewing
personally, and the suggested format seems a tad verbose perhaps vs
just formalizing "Approved", but it's probably good to have it be a bit
different from straight prose to be more explicit.

It also wasn't clear to me if the intention was for the commits to
be amended with the annotations?  (I don't think it was explicitly
stated in the original mail, and I'm not sure if it was an implicit
assumption?)

-- 
John Baldwin