From: Tuomo Keskitalo <Tuomo.Keskitalo@iki.fi>
To: Brian Gough <bjg@gnu.org>
Cc: GSL Discuss Mailing List <gsl-discuss@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A967114.8080600@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3r5v4527i.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk>
Hello,
thanks for the list. I was wondering that since there will be a new
major version, this might be a good chance to modify some of the APIs /
frameworks. Is this OK? For example, when I was implementing msadams and
msbdf for ode-initval, I had to make some modifications to the
algorithms in order to fit them into GSL ode-initval framework. It is
clear that the stepper, control and evolve objects would sometimes
benefit from mutual communication. Should ode-initval framework be
changed so that this kind of communication is possible in future?
How long would it be before 2.0 is out, approximately? More or less than
a year? It might be good idea to keep the 2.0 branch "unstable" for some
time, before APIs are frozen (if changes to frameworks are OK).
On 08/21/2009 11:41 PM, Brian Gough wrote:
> * Changes for Release 2.0
> Break binary compatibility, but keep source compatibility.
Does "source compatibility" mean that user interfaces / APIs should not
be changed?
> ** Convert to BZR? (check GPG signing and integrity guarantees)
Do you mean http://bazaar-vcs.org/Bzr ?
Would this mean to abandon git?
--
Tuomo.Keskitalo@iki.fi
http://iki.fi/tuomo.keskitalo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-27 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-30 17:07 ode-initval implicit solvers and development Tuomo Keskitalo
2008-10-01 18:29 ` Brian Gough
2008-10-09 13:22 ` Brian Gough
2008-11-02 17:35 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2008-11-03 18:09 ` Brian Gough
2009-01-24 11:52 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-02-01 17:01 ` Brian Gough
2009-02-02 17:05 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-03-01 14:37 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-03-03 16:34 ` Brian Gough
2009-03-05 19:47 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-03-05 19:54 ` Heikki Orsila
2009-03-06 20:03 ` Brian Gough
2009-04-05 12:28 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-05-01 14:05 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-05-04 11:23 ` Brian Gough
2009-05-08 10:51 ` Brian Gough
2009-08-06 13:51 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-08-21 20:42 ` Brian Gough
2009-08-27 11:42 ` Tuomo Keskitalo [this message]
2009-08-27 12:51 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-08-28 13:57 ` Jordi Burguet Castell
2009-08-27 17:13 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-08-28 13:58 ` Brian Gough
2009-08-27 23:10 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-08-27 23:13 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) Gerard Jungman
2009-08-28 13:58 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:43 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-03 19:37 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:44 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-07 15:10 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:34 ` Rhys Ulerich
2009-09-07 18:21 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-16 0:47 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-18 3:51 ` column-major Z F
2009-09-21 12:08 ` column-major Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:45 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-20 9:36 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-09-20 13:23 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-20 15:31 ` Rhys Ulerich
2009-09-20 16:19 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-21 15:13 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-20 15:08 ` Rhys Ulerich
2009-09-21 12:08 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:46 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-17 20:12 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:47 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-27 8:03 ` new double precision data structure? Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-09-28 8:44 ` James Bergstra
2009-09-28 15:48 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-10-16 13:59 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-29 18:38 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-07 15:10 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:46 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-16 2:48 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-17 19:14 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:44 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-17 20:12 ` Brian Gough
[not found] ` <645d17210909090818u474f32f0q19a6334578b9f02c@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-17 19:14 ` Brian Gough
2009-08-28 13:58 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap Brian Gough
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A967114.8080600@iki.fi \
--to=tuomo.keskitalo@iki.fi \
--cc=bjg@gnu.org \
--cc=gsl-discuss@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).