public inbox for gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Gough <bjg@gnu.org>
To: Tuomo Keskitalo <Tuomo.Keskitalo@iki.fi>
Cc: GSL Discuss Mailing List <gsl-discuss@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: ode-initval implicit solvers and development
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 10:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3ljp7amw3.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49FB01D1.30000@iki.fi>

At Fri, 01 May 2009 17:06:09 +0300,
Tuomo Keskitalo wrote:
> What do you think about this? How do we proceed? I don't think that I 
> will add any new functionality to my branch until I hear about the 
> continuation.

As this involves a change to the API, namely in the gsl_odeiv_control
and gsl_odeiv_step_type struct it will need to be in a new major
version.

I'll make the 1.13 release next month, with bug fixes for 1.12 only,
and then incorporate the new odes and other changes so that we can go
to a 2.0 release.

Since the new implicit RK routines are more robust that the old ones,
I suggest we just update them in place so that we don't need the
alternate name imprk--just rkimp.

I put some minor changes in the branch origin/tuomo at
http://src.network-theory.com/gsl.git

-- 
Brian Gough

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-08 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-30 17:07 Tuomo Keskitalo
2008-10-01 18:29 ` Brian Gough
2008-10-09 13:22 ` Brian Gough
2008-11-02 17:35 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2008-11-03 18:09   ` Brian Gough
2009-01-24 11:52     ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-02-01 17:01       ` Brian Gough
2009-02-02 17:05         ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-03-01 14:37           ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-03-03 16:34             ` Brian Gough
2009-03-05 19:47               ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-03-05 19:54                 ` Heikki Orsila
2009-03-06 20:03                 ` Brian Gough
2009-04-05 12:28             ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-05-01 14:05             ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-05-04 11:23               ` Brian Gough
2009-05-08 10:51               ` Brian Gough [this message]
2009-08-06 13:51                 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-08-21 20:42                   ` Brian Gough
2009-08-27 11:42                     ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-08-27 12:51                       ` Robert G. Brown
2009-08-28 13:57                         ` Jordi Burguet Castell
2009-08-27 17:13                           ` Robert G. Brown
2009-08-28 13:58                       ` Brian Gough
2009-08-27 23:10                     ` Gerard Jungman
2009-08-27 23:13                       ` GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) Gerard Jungman
2009-08-28 13:58                         ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16  0:43                           ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-03 19:37                         ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16  0:44                           ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-07 15:10                         ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16  0:44                           ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-17 20:12                             ` Brian Gough
     [not found]                           ` <645d17210909090818u474f32f0q19a6334578b9f02c@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-17 19:14                             ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10                         ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16  0:46                           ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-17 20:12                             ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10                         ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16  0:47                           ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-27  8:03                             ` new double precision data structure? Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-09-28  8:44                               ` James Bergstra
2009-09-28 15:48                                 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-10-16 13:59                                   ` Brian Gough
2009-09-29 18:38                               ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-07 15:10                         ` GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) Brian Gough
2009-09-16  0:46                           ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-16  2:48                             ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-17 19:14                             ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10                         ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16  0:45                           ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-20  9:36                             ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-09-20 13:23                               ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-20 15:31                                 ` Rhys Ulerich
2009-09-20 16:19                                   ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-21 15:13                                   ` Brian Gough
2009-09-20 15:08                               ` Rhys Ulerich
2009-09-21 12:08                               ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10                         ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:34                           ` Rhys Ulerich
2009-09-07 18:21                             ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-16  0:47                           ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-18  3:51                             ` column-major Z F
2009-09-21 12:08                               ` column-major Brian Gough
2009-08-28 13:58                     ` GSL 2.0 roadmap Brian Gough

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3ljp7amw3.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk \
    --to=bjg@gnu.org \
    --cc=Tuomo.Keskitalo@iki.fi \
    --cc=gsl-discuss@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).