From: "Robert G. Brown" <rgb@phy.duke.edu>
To: Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich@gmail.com>
Cc: gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view)
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0909071419160.6806@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a00655d0909070833q65730bbcgf44546478ff04be3@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1003 bytes --]
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
>> We could adopt FLAME, which is a much more general framework, C-based
>> and faster than LAPACK. Â I really think this is a better way to go
>> than LAPACK. Â Unfortunately it doesn't have so many routines at the
>> moment.
>
> +1 on the idea. The FLAME developers would probably be willing to
> fill in the gaps if it meant having FLAME underneath GSL 2.0. They're
> nice folks, and they love displacing LAPACK.
I've never been that fond of LAPACK anyway -- it's not like it is easy
to use and perfectly intuitive anyway.
The biggest issue would/will probably be rationalizing the views of
vector and matrix so they are sufficiently portable and easy to e.g.
pass in and out of ODE solvers and everything else consistently.
rgb
>
> - Rhys
>
Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/
Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305
Durham, N.C. 27708-0305
Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb@phy.duke.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-07 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-30 17:07 ode-initval implicit solvers and development Tuomo Keskitalo
2008-10-01 18:29 ` Brian Gough
2008-10-09 13:22 ` Brian Gough
2008-11-02 17:35 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2008-11-03 18:09 ` Brian Gough
2009-01-24 11:52 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-02-01 17:01 ` Brian Gough
2009-02-02 17:05 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-03-01 14:37 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-03-03 16:34 ` Brian Gough
2009-03-05 19:47 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-03-05 19:54 ` Heikki Orsila
2009-03-06 20:03 ` Brian Gough
2009-04-05 12:28 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-05-01 14:05 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-05-04 11:23 ` Brian Gough
2009-05-08 10:51 ` Brian Gough
2009-08-06 13:51 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-08-21 20:42 ` Brian Gough
2009-08-27 11:42 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-08-27 12:51 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-08-28 13:57 ` Jordi Burguet Castell
2009-08-27 17:13 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-08-28 13:58 ` Brian Gough
2009-08-27 23:10 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-08-27 23:13 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) Gerard Jungman
2009-08-28 13:58 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:43 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-03 19:37 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:44 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-07 15:10 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:46 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-16 2:48 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-17 19:14 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:47 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-27 8:03 ` new double precision data structure? Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-09-28 8:44 ` James Bergstra
2009-09-28 15:48 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-10-16 13:59 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-29 18:38 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-07 15:10 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:46 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-17 20:12 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:44 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-17 20:12 ` Brian Gough
[not found] ` <645d17210909090818u474f32f0q19a6334578b9f02c@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-17 19:14 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:34 ` Rhys Ulerich
2009-09-07 18:21 ` Robert G. Brown [this message]
2009-09-16 0:47 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-18 3:51 ` column-major Z F
2009-09-21 12:08 ` column-major Brian Gough
2009-09-07 15:10 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view) Brian Gough
2009-09-16 0:45 ` Gerard Jungman
2009-09-20 9:36 ` Tuomo Keskitalo
2009-09-20 13:23 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-20 15:31 ` Rhys Ulerich
2009-09-20 16:19 ` Robert G. Brown
2009-09-21 15:13 ` Brian Gough
2009-09-20 15:08 ` Rhys Ulerich
2009-09-21 12:08 ` Brian Gough
2009-08-28 13:58 ` GSL 2.0 roadmap Brian Gough
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0909071419160.6806@lilith \
--to=rgb@phy.duke.edu \
--cc=gsl-discuss@sourceware.org \
--cc=rhys.ulerich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).