public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava
@ 2006-12-05 9:18 r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-01-29 20:00 ` [Bug libgcj/30071] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com @ 2006-12-05 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
Failure to relink libjvm.la
xgcc: /SCRATCH/gcc-build/HP-UX/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00/install/lib/libgcj.sl: No
such file or directory
libtool: install: error: relink `libjvm.la' with the above command before
installing it
I tracked it down to an install sequence issue.
Makefile.in in the libjava directory contains the following install-exec-am
tag:
install-exec-am: install-binPROGRAMS install-binSCRIPTS \
install-dbexecDATA install-dbexecLTLIBRARIES \
install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES install-toolexecmainlibDATA
@$(NORMAL_INSTALL)
$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) install-exec-hook
This installs binPROGRAMS and dbexecLTLIBRARIES before toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES
what gives warnings like this:
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=install
/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/install -c 'gij'
'/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/install/bin/gij'
libtool: install: warning: `libgij.la' has not been installed in
`/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/install/lib'
libtool: install: warning:
`/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-4.2.0/gcc-4.2.0/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/libgcj.la'
has not been installed in
`/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/install/lib'
and fails on relinking of libjvm.la
xgcc: /SCRATCH/gcc-build/HP-UX/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00/install/lib/libgcj.sl: No
such file or directory
libtool: install: error: relink `libjvm.la' with the above command before
installing it
I changed the install-exec-am tag in the Makefile.in to:
install-exec-am: install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES install-toolexecmainlibDATA \
install-dbexecLTLIBRARIES install-dbexecDATA \
install-binPROGRAMS install-binSCRIPTS
@$(NORMAL_INSTALL)
$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) install-exec-hook
With this modification bootstrap, make check, and make install succeeds for at
least i686-pc-linux-gnu and hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00.
I'm not familiar with the automake machinery. So, somebody who knows the magics
may help to change the configuration accordingly.
--
Summary: make install fails for libjava
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
@ 2007-01-29 20:00 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-30 8:55 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-29 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-29 20:00 -------
We can't modify the Makefile.in, since those changes will be lost
the next time someone runs automake.
Could you try adding this to Makefile.am and then re-running automake?
(If you can't re-run automake, let me know and I will send you a patch.)
install-binPROGRAMS: install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES
This is not really supported by automake, but really this is working
around an automake bug anyhow.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-01-29 20:00:01
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-01-29 20:00 ` [Bug libgcj/30071] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-30 8:55 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-02-19 16:16 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com @ 2007-01-30 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #2 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-01-30 08:55 -------
Subject: Re: make install fails for libjava
> Could you try adding this to Makefile.am and then re-running automake?
> (If you can't re-run automake, let me know and I will send you a patch.)
Sorry, I don't have the right automake version around. So, a patch to test
would
be nice.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-01-29 20:00 ` [Bug libgcj/30071] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-30 8:55 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
@ 2007-02-19 16:16 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-04-17 6:54 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com @ 2007-02-19 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #3 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-02-19 16:16 -------
> Could you try adding this to Makefile.am and then re-running automake?
> (If you can't re-run automake, let me know and I will send you a patch.)
>
> install-binPROGRAMS: install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES
>
I think the only solution is to add the install-exec-am target to the
Makefile.am.
install-exec-am: install-binPROGRAMS install-binSCRIPTS \
install-dbexecDATA install-dbexecLTLIBRARIES \
install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES install-toolexecmainlibDATA
@$(NORMAL_INSTALL)
$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) install-exec-hook
This works for me.
Could somebody else try this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-19 16:16 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
@ 2007-04-17 6:54 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-07-27 20:11 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com @ 2007-04-17 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #4 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2007-04-17 07:54 -------
Created an attachment (id=13377)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13377&action=view)
Patch
Proposed patch. I added a new target (install-exec-am) to Makefile.am to
enforce the right installation sequence.
Tested on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 and i686-pc-linux-gnu.
I hope somebody is able to verify and submit the patch.
In general there is the question, if we need a regular testing of 'make
install, to detect these kind of problems, which only give warnings on linux
but prevend successful installation on different targets.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-04-17 6:54 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
@ 2007-07-27 20:11 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-29 21:24 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-27 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 20:11 -------
I don't think we should use this particular patch. My reason is that
ordering alone is insufficient to guarantee success here, if the user
uses "make -j".
Instead, explicit dependencies should be used. In addition to fixing the
above these might be a bit more resilient (who knows?) when automake changes.
See comment #1 for an example; basically an install target for an executable
should depend on the needed library install target.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-27 20:11 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-29 21:24 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-03 20:54 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-29 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #6 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 21:24 -------
install-binPROGRAMS: install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES 'overwrites' the
install-binPROGRAMS generated by automake. So this is a no go.
I helped myself with this one:
Index: Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- Makefile.am (revision 126962)
+++ Makefile.am (working copy)
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@
$(extra_headers) $(srcdir)/java/lang/Object.h $(srcdir)/java/lang/Class.h:
@:
-install-exec-hook: install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES install-libexecsubPROGRAMS
+install-exec-hook: install-binPROGRAMS install-toolexeclibLTLIBRARIES
install-libexecsubPROGRAMS
## Support for libgcj_bc: dummy shared library used only at link-time.
if USE_LIBGCJ_BC
## Install libgcj_bc dummy lib in the target directory. We also need to delete
This one is similar to the one Rainer posted and it might not work if one is
doing a parallel install.
I'll do a test on my farm and see how it behaves on different architectures.
Tom mentioned on IRC that it would be a 'go' for the time being. But one has to
file a bug on automake. (1.9.6 used here). Will do so.
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |andreast at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2007-01-29 20:00:01 |2007-07-29 21:24:48
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-29 21:24 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-03 20:54 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-03 20:56 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-03 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 20:54 -------
Created an attachment (id=15089)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15089&action=view)
New trial for the patch in #6, cosmetics only.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-03 20:54 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-03 20:56 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-06 20:46 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-06 20:46 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-03 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #8 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 20:56 -------
Ughh, I completely forgot about this PR. But I remember having had some issues
with the generated Makefile.in. It had some more places which were modified
than I expected. So I may actively forgot about this issue.
I usually do the testing of a patch on different archs. And if it succeeds, I
prepare the patch on my main working arch which is OS-X. So here the
preparation caused some headache on my side.
But after jumping in again, I see it seems to be a problem of my environment
rather than the patch itself. Doing the prep on x86-linux or hpux itself shows
only the modification in the patch itself for Makfile.in.
I attach a new version of the patch which should solve the problem for now.
Comments?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-03 20:56 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-06 20:46 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-06 20:46 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-06 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #9 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-06 20:46 -------
Subject: Bug 30071
Author: andreast
Date: Wed Feb 6 20:45:21 2008
New Revision: 132159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132159
Log:
2008-02-06 Andreas Tobler <a.tobler@schweiz.org>
PR libgcj/30071
* Makefile.am (install-exec-hook): Add install-binPROGRAMS.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
Modified:
trunk/libjava/ChangeLog
trunk/libjava/Makefile.am
trunk/libjava/Makefile.in
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/30071] make install fails for libjava
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-06 20:46 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-06 20:46 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-06 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #10 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-06 20:46 -------
Committed after ok from Tom T. and a verification install from Dave A.
Thanks.
--
andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30071
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-06 20:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-05 9:18 [Bug libgcj/30071] New: make install fails for libjava r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-01-29 20:00 ` [Bug libgcj/30071] " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-30 8:55 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-02-19 16:16 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-04-17 6:54 ` r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
2007-07-27 20:11 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-29 21:24 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-03 20:54 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-03 20:56 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-06 20:46 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-06 20:46 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).