[PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Mike Frysinger]

All other arches have this in their syscall list.  Looks like hppa
is missing it though and breaks one or two apps that try to call it.

URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/411745
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>

2012-04-12  Mike Frysinger  <vapier@gentoo.org>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list: Add prlimit64.
---
 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list
index 0f7537c..1b6b311 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list
@@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ socketpair	-	socketpair	i:iiif	__socketpair	socketpair
 
 setrlimit	-	setrlimit	i:ip	__setrlimit	setrlimit	
 getrlimit	-	getrlimit	i:ip	__getrlimit	getrlimit	
+prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
-- 
1.7.8.5

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Roland McGrath]

> All other arches have this in their syscall list.  Looks like hppa
> is missing it though and breaks one or two apps that try to call it.

If it's really "all", then why isn't it in linux/syscalls.list instead?


Thanks,
Roland

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1783 bytes --]

On Thursday 12 April 2012 19:07:24 Roland McGrath wrote:
> > All other arches have this in their syscall list.  Looks like hppa
> > is missing it though and breaks one or two apps that try to call it.
> 
> If it's really "all", then why isn't it in linux/syscalls.list instead?

i'm not familiar with how stacking works and the syscalls.list, but the 64bit
arches need to do something different from the 32bit arches.  on 64bit,
prlimit64 is just an alias to prlimit.  for 32bit arches, they need to declare
the list themselves.

sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64/syscalls.list lists it unconditionally
(for the alias), and from there, it seems that all the 32bit arches add it to
their arch-specific list.

sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/syscalls.list:prlimit64    EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/syscalls.list:prlimit64     EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/syscalls.list:prlimit64  EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/syscalls.list:prlimit64 EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/syscalls.list:prlimit64  EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/syscalls.list:prlimit64     EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/syscalls.list:prlimit64     EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/syscalls.list:prlimit64 EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64
ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscalls.list:prlimit64    EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64

hppa is the only one here i can see missing.  and probably the new
"generic/wordsize-32/" ...
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>> All other arches have this in their syscall list.  Looks like hppa
>> is missing it though and breaks one or two apps that try to call it.
>
> If it's really "all", then why isn't it in linux/syscalls.list instead?

That's exactly the question I asked myself when I handed a similar
patch to one of our hppa developers last week :-)

Cheers,
Carlos.

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> All other arches have this in their syscall list.  Looks like hppa
> is missing it though and breaks one or two apps that try to call it.
>
> URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/411745
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
>
> 2012-04-12  Mike Frysinger  <vapier@gentoo.org>
>
>        * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list: Add prlimit64.
> ---
>  sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list
> index 0f7537c..1b6b311 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/hppa/syscalls.list
> @@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ socketpair    -       socketpair      i:iiif  __socketpair    socketpair
>
>  setrlimit      -       setrlimit       i:ip    __setrlimit     setrlimit
>  getrlimit      -       getrlimit       i:ip    __getrlimit     getrlimit
> +prlimit64      EXTRA   prlimit64       i:iipp  prlimit64
> --
> 1.7.8.5

Sorry for making you do this work, I had this patch already done last
week but I forgot to push it out.

I'll checkin your version as soon as I get trunk building again with
my crt* and elf changes.

Cheers,
Carlos.

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 393 bytes --]

On Thursday 12 April 2012 22:02:15 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Sorry for making you do this work, I had this patch already done last
> week but I forgot to push it out.

np.  didn't take long to figure out + fix.

> I'll checkin your version as soon as I get trunk building again with
> my crt* and elf changes.

this i did have to hack together and really had no idea if it was correct :)
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Roland McGrath]

> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64/syscalls.list lists it unconditionally
> (for the alias), and from there, it seems that all the 32bit arches add it to
> their arch-specific list.

That should mean that adding it to sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list
should do the right thing for hppa, and that removing it from other
machine-specific syscalls.list files will then have no effect on the status
quo.  Can you try that and verify?


Thanks,
Roland

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1616 bytes --]

On Thursday 12 April 2012 23:58:54 Roland McGrath wrote:
> > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64/syscalls.list lists it
> > unconditionally (for the alias), and from there, it seems that all the
> > 32bit arches add it to their arch-specific list.
> 
> That should mean that adding it to sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list
> should do the right thing for hppa, and that removing it from other
> machine-specific syscalls.list files will then have no effect on the status
> quo.  Can you try that and verify?

ok, i confused myself.  wordsize-64/syscalls.list has the line:
prlimit     EXTRA   prlimit64   i:iipp  prlimit     prlimit64

while the 32bit arches have:
prlimit64   EXTRA   prlimit64   i:iipp  prlimit64

and additionally, we have:
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/prlimit.c

so if we try to build a 64bit system with both these syscalls.list entries, we 
hit a build error:
/usr/local/src/gnu/glibc/build/x86_64/libc_pic.a(prlimit64.os): In function 
`prlimit64':
/usr/local/src/gnu/glibc/misc/../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81: multiple 
definition of `__GI_prlimit64'
/usr/local/src/gnu/glibc/build/x86_64/libc_pic.a(prlimit.os):/usr/local/src/gnu/glibc/misc/../sysdeps/unix/syscall-
template.S:81: first defined here

which makes sense as normally we don't generate a prlimit64 file at all, just a 
prlimit wrapper with a prlimit64 alias in it.

so the next thing i tried was creating 
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-32/syscalls.list and adding the new prlimit 
alias there.  but a simple i686 build doesn't pick up the new location of the 
prlimit64 symbol.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> while the 32bit arches have:
> prlimit64   EXTRA   prlimit64   i:iipp  prlimit64

> so the next thing i tried was creating 
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-32/syscalls.list and adding the new prlimit 
> alias there.  but a simple i686 build doesn't pick up the new location of the 
> prlimit64 symbol.

Well, it wouldn't be an *alias*; it would be the prlimit64 entry above.  
But, if the point is to fix things for hppa then you need to arrange for 
hppa to get a GLIBC_2.17 version for prlimit64, not the default GLIBC_2.13 
since in fact the function was missing in 2.13 for hppa - as noted in 
point (v) for hppa in my list at 
<http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2012-06/msg00048.html>.  (The lack of 
ABI baselines - which of course ought to be checked against binaries of 
old releases when set up - is point (g) on that list, and (x) is another 
point involving checks against old binaries.)

(Adding the entry, but with @@GLIBC_2.17 like the SH fanotify_mark, to the 
hppa syscalls.list along with an appropriate Versions entry, is certainly 
the safer approach than doing something with the potential to affect other 
architectures, even though it may also be good to work out how to clean 
these things up.  Note hppa also needs fanotify_mark at a new version, and 
note that cleanups here only help existing architectures; there are no 
issues for new architectures using linux-generic because linux-generic 
already has the right entries in syscalls.list.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>> while the 32bit arches have:
>> prlimit64   EXTRA   prlimit64   i:iipp  prlimit64
>
>> so the next thing i tried was creating
>> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-32/syscalls.list and adding the new prlimit
>> alias there.  but a simple i686 build doesn't pick up the new location of the
>> prlimit64 symbol.
>
> Well, it wouldn't be an *alias*; it would be the prlimit64 entry above.
> But, if the point is to fix things for hppa then you need to arrange for
> hppa to get a GLIBC_2.17 version for prlimit64, not the default GLIBC_2.13
> since in fact the function was missing in 2.13 for hppa - as noted in
> point (v) for hppa in my list at
> <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2012-06/msg00048.html>.  (The lack of
> ABI baselines - which of course ought to be checked against binaries of
> old releases when set up - is point (g) on that list, and (x) is another
> point involving checks against old binaries.)
>
> (Adding the entry, but with @@GLIBC_2.17 like the SH fanotify_mark, to the
> hppa syscalls.list along with an appropriate Versions entry, is certainly
> the safer approach than doing something with the potential to affect other
> architectures, even though it may also be good to work out how to clean
> these things up.  Note hppa also needs fanotify_mark at a new version, and
> note that cleanups here only help existing architectures; there are no
> issues for new architectures using linux-generic because linux-generic
> already has the right entries in syscalls.list.)

I've been spending the weekend bringing up new hardware for my hppa
testing, so hopefully I can get back to tackling the maintenance
backlog (along with any 2.15 and 2.16 backport requests).

Cheers,
Carlos.

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 924 bytes --]

On Sunday 12 August 2012 08:59:20 Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> (Adding the entry, but with @@GLIBC_2.17 like the SH fanotify_mark, to the
> hppa syscalls.list along with an appropriate Versions entry, is certainly
> the safer approach than doing something with the potential to affect other
> architectures, even though it may also be good to work out how to clean
> these things up.  Note hppa also needs fanotify_mark at a new version, and
> note that cleanups here only help existing architectures;

i originally posted just an entry updating hppa but was encouraged at looking 
at cleaning up everyone

> there are no
> issues for new architectures using linux-generic because linux-generic
> already has the right entries in syscalls.list.)

if all new arches are expected to start with linux-generic as its base, then i 
can see leaning towards just adding the entry to hppa and being done with it
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 12 August 2012 08:59:20 Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> (Adding the entry, but with @@GLIBC_2.17 like the SH fanotify_mark, to the
>> hppa syscalls.list along with an appropriate Versions entry, is certainly
>> the safer approach than doing something with the potential to affect other
>> architectures, even though it may also be good to work out how to clean
>> these things up.  Note hppa also needs fanotify_mark at a new version, and
>> note that cleanups here only help existing architectures;
>
> i originally posted just an entry updating hppa but was encouraged at looking
> at cleaning up everyone
>
>> there are no
>> issues for new architectures using linux-generic because linux-generic
>> already has the right entries in syscalls.list.)
>
> if all new arches are expected to start with linux-generic as its base, then i
> can see leaning towards just adding the entry to hppa and being done with it

Agreed. That's a practical and immediate fix.

Cheers,
Carlos.

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 8380 bytes --]

for posterity, here's what i attempted
-mike

From 9532af952bae3ddd59526ec8e99a7c7f708c8b6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:24:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Linux prlimit64: move 32bit version to common location

Most 32bit targets declare the prlimit64 wrapper in the arch-specific
syscalls.list file.  The few that don't are broken (like hppa), but
rather than copy & paste that line into the missing arches, move it
to the central Linux location.  For 64bit targets, there is a line in
the wordsize-64 directory that overrides this.

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>

./ChangeLog
2012-08-11  Mike Frysinger  <vapier@gentoo.org>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list: Add prlimit64.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/syscalls.list: Delete prlimit64.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/syscalls.list: Likewise.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/syscalls.list: Likewise.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/syscalls.list: Likewise.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/syscalls.list: Likewise.

./ports/ChangeLog.arm
2012-08-11  Mike Frysinger  <vapier@gentoo.org>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/syscalls.list: Delete prlimit64.

./ports/ChangeLog.linux-generic
2012-08-11  Mike Frysinger  <vapier@gentoo.org>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/syscalls.list:
	Delete prlimit64.

./ports/ChangeLog.m68k
2012-08-11  Mike Frysinger  <vapier@gentoo.org>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscalls.list: Delete prlimit64.

./ports/ChangeLog.mips
2012-08-11  Mike Frysinger  <vapier@gentoo.org>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/syscalls.list: Delete
	prlimit64.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/syscalls.list: Delete
	prlimit64.
---
 ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/syscalls.list    |    2 --
 .../sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/syscalls.list   |    1 -
 ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscalls.list   |    1 -
 .../unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/syscalls.list      |    2 --
 .../unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/syscalls.list  |    2 --
 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/syscalls.list         |    2 --
 .../sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/syscalls.list     |    1 -
 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/syscalls.list |    1 -
 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/syscalls.list           |    2 --
 .../unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/syscalls.list    |    1 -
 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list              |    1 +
 11 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/syscalls.list b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/syscalls.list
index ba8cdd7..40ddc95 100644
--- a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/syscalls.list
+++ b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/syscalls.list
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 
 chown		-	chown32		i:sii	__chown		chown
 
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
-
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	fanotify_mark
 
 # Semaphore and shm system calls.  msgctl, shmctl, and semctl have C
diff --git a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/syscalls.list 
b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/syscalls.list
index 58b4057..fd555a2 100644
--- a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/syscalls.list
+++ b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/generic/wordsize-32/syscalls.list
@@ -3,5 +3,4 @@
 # rlimit APIs
 getrlimit	-	getrlimit	i:ip	__getrlimit	getrlimit	
 setrlimit	-	setrlimit	i:ip	__setrlimit	setrlimit	
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	fanotify_mark
diff --git a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscalls.list b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscalls.list
index 1e27d8d..b324fd1 100644
--- a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscalls.list
+++ b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/syscalls.list
@@ -3,5 +3,4 @@
 chown		-	chown32		i:sii	__chown		chown
 
 cacheflush	EXTRA	cacheflush	i:iiii	__cacheflush	cacheflush
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	fanotify_mark
diff --git a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/syscalls.list b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/syscalls.list
index f357b5c..5cafa95 100644
--- a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/syscalls.list
+++ b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/syscalls.list
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
 # File name	Caller	Syscall name	# args	Strong name	Weak names
 
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
-
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	fanotify_mark
diff --git a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/syscalls.list b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/syscalls.list
index 7ad5523..dd5ea93 100644
--- a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/syscalls.list
+++ b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/syscalls.list
@@ -3,6 +3,4 @@
 readahead	-	readahead	i:iii	__readahead	readahead
 sync_file_range	-	sync_file_range	Ci:iiii	sync_file_range
 
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
-
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiis	fanotify_mark
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/syscalls.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/syscalls.list
index 149d432..da587b2 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/syscalls.list
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/syscalls.list
@@ -7,6 +7,4 @@ oldgetrlimit	EXTRA	getrlimit	i:ip	__old_getrlimit	getrlimit@GLIBC_2.0
 oldsetrlimit	EXTRA	setrlimit	i:ip	__old_setrlimit	setrlimit@GLIBC_2.0
 waitpid		-	waitpid		Ci:ipi	__waitpid	waitpid	__libc_waitpid
 
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
-
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	fanotify_mark
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/syscalls.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/syscalls.list
index aaa3557..420bfad 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/syscalls.list
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/syscalls.list
@@ -7,5 +7,4 @@ oldsetrlimit	EXTRA	setrlimit	i:ip	__old_setrlimit	setrlimit@GLIBC_2.0
 # Due to 64bit alignment there is a dummy second parameter
 readahead	-	readahead	i:iiiii	__readahead	readahead
 
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	fanotify_mark
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/syscalls.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/syscalls.list
index e946d33..061dc55 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/syscalls.list
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-32/syscalls.list
@@ -4,5 +4,4 @@ oldgetrlimit	EXTRA	getrlimit	i:ip	__old_getrlimit	getrlimit@GLIBC_2.0
 oldsetrlimit	EXTRA	setrlimit	i:ip	__old_setrlimit	setrlimit@GLIBC_2.0
 vfork		-	vfork		0	__vfork		vfork
 
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	fanotify_mark
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/syscalls.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/syscalls.list
index faffe37..62a4002 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/syscalls.list
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/syscalls.list
@@ -2,6 +2,4 @@
 
 waitpid		-	waitpid		Ci:ipi	__waitpid	waitpid	__libc_waitpid
 
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
-
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	__fanotify_mark	fanotify_mark@@GLIBC_2.16
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/syscalls.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/syscalls.list
index 3d70185..b6d0aed 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/syscalls.list
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/syscalls.list
@@ -5,5 +5,4 @@ getrlimit	-	getrlimit	2	__getrlimit	getrlimit
 getresuid	-	getresuid32	3	getresuid
 getresgid	-	getresgid32	3	getresgid
 
-prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
 fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	fanotify_mark
diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list
index 6343272..a7da7c5 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ pipe2		-	pipe2		i:fi	__pipe2		pipe2
 pivot_root	EXTRA	pivot_root	i:ss	pivot_root
 poll		-	poll		Ci:pii	__libc_poll	__poll poll
 prctl		EXTRA	prctl		i:iiiii	__prctl		prctl
+prlimit64	EXTRA	prlimit64	i:iipp	prlimit64
 putpmsg		-	putpmsg		i:ippii	putpmsg
 query_module	EXTRA	query_module	i:sipip	query_module
 quotactl	EXTRA	quotactl	i:isip	quotactl
-- 
1.7.9.7


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> if all new arches are expected to start with linux-generic as its base, then i 
> can see leaning towards just adding the entry to hppa and being done with it

That's a kernel expectation rather than a glibc one - but while new glibc 
ports for old kernel ports are certainly possible, new glibc ports are 
more likely for new kernel ports, and new kernel ports are expected to use 
the generic ABI.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> I've been spending the weekend bringing up new hardware for my hppa
> testing, so hopefully I can get back to tackling the maintenance
> backlog (along with any 2.15 and 2.16 backport requests).

A large proportion of the issues I listed, and of the subsequent global 
changes needing hppa versions, and quite possibly of the open hppa ports 
issues in Bugzilla, could be done purely as mechanical changes without 
hardware testing, to reduce the size of the backlog.  It's finding and 
fixing the issues missing from my list that will need proper testing.

(For reference, my notes of ports changes (for more than just hppa - there 
are alpha and ia64 issues here too) that would be appropriate given 
post-2.16 libc changes but haven't yet been done:

[2012-08-07] hppa cleanup __ASSUME_LWS_CAS

[2012-08-02] am33, ia64 ASM_TYPE_DIRECTIVE

[2012-07-17] alpha, hppa, ia64 TLS configure checks remove

[2012-07-17] hppa, am33 (and SH) c++-types data

[2012-07-10] am33 ASM_GLOBAL_DIRECTIVE

)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com