From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon@panix.com>
To: sampln@sbcglobal.net
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Three thoughts
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408251716.i7PHGDk06309@panix5.panix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1093412211.8185.599.camel@localhost> (message from Lincoln Peters on Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:36:52 -0700)
> The problem is that it doesn't do anything about the units that are
> still drawn underneath the selected unit. Unless those units are either
> hidden or otherwise obscured (maybe by making them semi-transparent), it
> really does look ugly when a lot of units, some overlapping, are in one
> cell.
Ah, OK. I think the job may have been half-done.
If I understood the design correctly, the idea was that the
non-selected units would become very small and be arranged around the
outside of the cell. So to try to render it in ASCII art:
i i b f
c IIIII f
I
c I f
I
d IIIII f
d d f f
where the big "I" is the selected unit, and the "i", "i", etc are the
non-selected units.
At least, I think that is one of the ideas that Stan had been playing
with.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-25 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-20 16:22 mskala
2004-08-20 18:34 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-20 21:17 ` Andreas Bringedal
2004-08-20 21:28 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-20 23:57 ` Andreas Bringedal
2004-08-21 1:21 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-21 4:35 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-21 20:38 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-20 22:03 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-08-20 23:27 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-21 1:17 ` mskala
2004-08-21 2:31 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-21 4:33 ` mskala
2004-08-22 3:09 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-22 6:38 ` Item Units Elijah Meeks
2004-08-22 9:37 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-24 1:43 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-24 2:38 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-24 2:51 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-24 3:32 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-22 14:00 ` Three thoughts mskala
2004-08-22 18:56 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-22 19:16 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-23 4:31 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-23 13:04 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-08-24 18:07 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-24 20:59 ` Elijah Meeks
2004-08-25 0:54 ` Unit-Image Bug Elijah Meeks
2004-08-25 4:58 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-23 16:48 ` Three thoughts Eric McDonald
2004-08-24 0:55 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-24 2:09 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-24 3:02 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-24 18:12 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-25 5:34 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-25 17:16 ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-25 22:09 ` Jim Kingdon [this message]
2004-08-26 2:15 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-26 6:17 ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-26 19:12 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-26 22:08 ` CXP??? Elijah Meeks
2004-08-27 1:50 ` CXP??? Lincoln Peters
2004-08-27 5:10 ` CXP??? Eric McDonald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200408251716.i7PHGDk06309@panix5.panix.com \
--to=kingdon@panix.com \
--cc=sampln@sbcglobal.net \
--cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).