public inbox for xconq7@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon@panix.com>
To: mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu
Cc: xconq7@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Three thoughts
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 06:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200408260613.i7Q6Dk903199@panix5.panix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408251818060.23103-100000@leon.phy.cmich.edu> (message from Eric McDonald on Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:33:29 -0400 (EDT))

> When you say around the outside of the cell, do you 
> still mean inside the cell perimeter or outside of it?

Probably inside, although I don't know whether the feature was ever
thought through in that much detail.

> (1) Scaling images to non-standard sizes would likely be 
> necessary to accomodate the suggested scheme.

Or playing with the size of the hexes, or re-working the bigicons
feature, or something.  There are plenty of details that would need to
worked out.  But first one needs to think through whether the concept
seems promising in general.

> (3) Scaling down the images of other units would likely degrade 
> their identifiability as certain types

The smallest image currently in use is about a 4x4?  It is pretty
small.  I don't imagine you'd go smaller than that.

> I still think that putting a "portrait" of the selected unit in 
> the unit info window would be better. But, that's just my 
> opinion....

Well, yes, the unit info window is useful in tcltk as it stands now,
and making it more graphical/informative is certainly one way to
approach this problem.

But it is also worthwhile thinking about whether there is some way to
provide some of the information with having to look back and forth to
a window which is off to the side.  Maybe it isn't center and edges,
maybe it is top and bottom.  In the tcltk interface now, the top half
is for the transport and the bottom half is for the occupants.  What
if the top half were for the selected unit and the bottom half were
for the others?  With scaling and drawing otherwise the same as now.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-26  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-20 16:22 mskala
2004-08-20 18:34 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-20 21:17   ` Andreas Bringedal
2004-08-20 21:28     ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-20 23:57       ` Andreas Bringedal
2004-08-21  1:21         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-21  4:35           ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-21 20:38           ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-20 22:03     ` Elijah Meeks
2004-08-20 23:27       ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-21  1:17         ` mskala
2004-08-21  2:31           ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-21  4:33             ` mskala
2004-08-22  3:09 ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-22  6:38   ` Item Units Elijah Meeks
2004-08-22  9:37     ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-24  1:43       ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-24  2:38         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-24  2:51           ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-24  3:32             ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-22 14:00   ` Three thoughts mskala
2004-08-22 18:56     ` Hans Ronne
2004-08-22 19:16       ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-23  4:31         ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-23 13:04           ` Elijah Meeks
2004-08-24 18:07             ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-24 20:59               ` Elijah Meeks
2004-08-25  0:54                 ` Unit-Image Bug Elijah Meeks
2004-08-25  4:58                   ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-23 16:48         ` Three thoughts Eric McDonald
2004-08-24  0:55           ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-24  2:09             ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-24  3:02               ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-24 18:12                 ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-25  5:34                   ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-25 17:16                     ` Lincoln Peters
2004-08-25 22:09                       ` Jim Kingdon
2004-08-26  2:15                         ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-26  6:17                           ` Jim Kingdon [this message]
2004-08-26 19:12                             ` Eric McDonald
2004-08-26 22:08                               ` CXP??? Elijah Meeks
2004-08-27  1:50                                 ` CXP??? Lincoln Peters
2004-08-27  5:10                                 ` CXP??? Eric McDonald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200408260613.i7Q6Dk903199@panix5.panix.com \
    --to=kingdon@panix.com \
    --cc=mcdonald@phy.cmich.edu \
    --cc=xconq7@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).