public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
	"Jiang, Haochen" <haochen.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/18] x86: parse special opcode modifiers for .insn
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 13:57:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <242fa8c9-44f3-43e8-fbbd-4248a6abec18@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <764b9e03-18bd-6945-692f-a250522196ca@suse.com>

So called "short form" encoding is specified by a trailing "+r", whereas
a possible extension opcode is specified by the usual "/<digit>". Take
these off the expression before handing it to get_absolute_expression().
---
I don't think it makes sense to further complicate things and also
consider the use of quotation inside the major opcode expression.
Ambiguities in particular with "/<digit>" can easily be resolved by
simply parenthesizing the actual expression part of the construct.

--- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
@@ -10739,7 +10739,7 @@ signed_cons (int size)
 static void
 s_insn (int dummy ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 {
-  char mnemonic[MAX_MNEM_SIZE], *line = input_line_pointer;
+  char mnemonic[MAX_MNEM_SIZE], *line = input_line_pointer, *ptr;
   char *saved_ilp = find_end_of_line (line, false), saved_char;
   const char *end;
   unsigned int j;
@@ -10765,6 +10765,7 @@ s_insn (int dummy ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 
   current_templates = &tt;
   i.tm.mnem_off = MN__insn;
+  i.tm.extension_opcode = None;
 
   if (startswith (line, "VEX")
       && (line[3] == '.' || is_space_char (line[3])))
@@ -10991,10 +10992,46 @@ s_insn (int dummy ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
       goto done;
     }
 
+  /* Before processing the opcode expression, find trailing "+r" or
+     "/<digit>" specifiers.  */
+  for (ptr = line; ; ++ptr)
+    {
+      unsigned long n;
+      char *e;
+
+      ptr = strpbrk (ptr, "+/,");
+      if (ptr == NULL || *ptr == ',')
+	break;
+
+      if (*ptr == '+' && ptr[1] == 'r'
+	  && (ptr[2] == ',' || (is_space_char (ptr[2]) && ptr[3] == ',')))
+	{
+	  *ptr = ' ';
+	  ptr[1] = ' ';
+	  i.short_form = true;
+	  break;
+	}
+
+      if (*ptr == '/' && ISDIGIT (ptr[1])
+	  && (n = strtoul (ptr + 1, &e, 8)) < 8
+	  && e == ptr + 2
+	  && (ptr[2] == ',' || (is_space_char (ptr[2]) && ptr[3] == ',')))
+	{
+	  *ptr = ' ';
+	  ptr[1] = ' ';
+	  i.tm.extension_opcode = n;
+	  i.tm.opcode_modifier.modrm = 1;
+	  break;
+	}
+    }
+
   input_line_pointer = line;
   val = get_absolute_expression ();
   line = input_line_pointer;
 
+  if (i.short_form && (val & 7))
+    as_warn ("`+r' assumes low three opcode bits to be clear");
+
   for (j = 1; j < sizeof(val); ++j)
     if (!(val >> (j * 8)))
       break;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-03 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-03 12:54 [PATCH 00/18] x86: new .insn directive Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 12:56 ` [PATCH 01/18] x86: introduce " Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 12:57 ` [PATCH 02/18] x86: parse VEX and alike specifiers for .insn Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 12:57 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2023-03-03 12:58 ` [PATCH 04/18] x86: use set_rex_vrex() also for short-form handling Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 12:58 ` [PATCH 05/18] x86: move more disp processing out of md_assemble() Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 12:59 ` [PATCH 06/18] x86-64: adjust REX-prefix part of SSE2AVX test Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:00 ` [PATCH 07/18] x86: re-work build_modrm_byte()'s register assignment Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:00 ` [PATCH 08/18] x86: VexVVVV is now merely a boolean Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:01 ` [PATCH 09/18] x86: drop "shimm" special case template expansions Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:01 ` [PATCH 10/18] x86/AT&T: restrict recognition of the "absolute branch" prefix character Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:02 ` [PATCH 11/18] x86: process instruction operands for .insn Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:03 ` [PATCH 12/18] x86: decouple broadcast type and bytes fields Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:03 ` [PATCH 13/18] x86: handle EVEX Disp8 for .insn Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:04 ` [PATCH 14/18] x86: allow for multiple immediates in output_disp() Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:05 ` [PATCH 15/18] x86: handle immediate operands for .insn Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:05 ` [PATCH 16/18] x86: document .insn Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 17/18] x86: convert testcases to use .insn Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 13:06 ` [PATCH RFC 18/18] x86: .insn example - VEX-encoded instructions of original Xeon Phi Jan Beulich
2023-03-03 16:50 ` [PATCH 00/18] x86: new .insn directive H.J. Lu
2023-03-06  9:26   ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-07 20:33     ` H.J. Lu
2023-03-08  7:54       ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-08  8:09         ` Jiang, Haochen
2023-03-09  6:52           ` Kong, Lingling
2023-03-05 10:07 ` Jiang, Haochen
2023-03-06  9:01   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=242fa8c9-44f3-43e8-fbbd-4248a6abec18@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=haochen.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).