Re: Evolution of the DocBook tools

[Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1185 bytes --]

Peter Ring wrote:
> 
> Keep talking!
> 
> I've been waiting for this subject to get some real focus. It seemed
> that most SGML tool developers were happy hacking their means of
> distribution (including introducing silly variants of SGML Open catalog
> files), which is fine as long as you can pretend to own the poor users'
> namespace. Well, you don't.
> (snipped)
> Comments? Thoughts?

There is really a need for a good namespace.

Join us on the new list, we will make a presentation of
everyone's good ideas like your ones, and then reach a
consensus. When the recommandations will be agreed by
anyone, we will present them and try to make them accepted
as a standard.


-- 
 Éric Bischoff   -   mailto:ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr
 __________________________________________________
                                           \^o~_.
     .~.                           ______  /( __ )
     /V\         Toys story         \__  \/  (  V
   //   \\                            \__| (__=v
  /(     )\                        |\___/     )
    ^^-^^                           \_____(  )
     Tux                        Konqui     \__=v
 __________________________________________________