public inbox for docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Bischoff <ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr>
To: "'docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com'"
	<docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: Evolution of the DocBook tools
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 06:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38B7105F.6FAE14BE@cybercable.tm.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c=DK%a=_%p=CD-Danmark%l=CDDKSERVER-000225110001Z-8990@cddkserver.cddk.dk>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1185 bytes --]

Peter Ring wrote:
> 
> Keep talking!
> 
> I've been waiting for this subject to get some real focus. It seemed
> that most SGML tool developers were happy hacking their means of
> distribution (including introducing silly variants of SGML Open catalog
> files), which is fine as long as you can pretend to own the poor users'
> namespace. Well, you don't.
> (snipped)
> Comments? Thoughts?

There is really a need for a good namespace.

Join us on the new list, we will make a presentation of
everyone's good ideas like your ones, and then reach a
consensus. When the recommandations will be agreed by
anyone, we will present them and try to make them accepted
as a standard.


-- 
 Éric Bischoff   -   mailto:ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr
 __________________________________________________
                                           \^o~_.
     .~.                           ______  /( __ )
     /V\         Toys story         \__  \/  (  V
   //   \\                            \__| (__=v
  /(     )\                        |\___/     )
    ^^-^^                           \_____(  )
     Tux                        Konqui     \__=v
 __________________________________________________

  reply	other threads:[~2000-12-27  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-27  6:36 Peter Ring
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Eric Bischoff [this message]
     [not found] <951281049.19725.ezmlm@sourceware.cygnus.com>
2000-12-27  6:36 ` db2??????? vs. SGMLTools2 vs. what else? Horacio MG
2000-12-27  6:36   ` Re : " Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36     ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36       ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36         ` Jochem Huhmann
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Evolution of the DocBook tools Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36             ` Jorge Godoy
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36           ` Eric Bischoff
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-27  6:36 Gregory Leblanc
2000-12-27  6:36 ` Eric Bischoff
2000-12-27  6:36 Eric Bischoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38B7105F.6FAE14BE@cybercable.tm.fr \
    --to=ebisch@cybercable.tm.fr \
    --cc=docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).